[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2b66797b-3ee9-a70f-25d0-dcab830859d2@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 09:51:48 +0300
From: Mika Penttilä <mpenttil@...hat.com>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>, mike.kravetz@...cle.com,
muchun.song@...ux.dev, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: use PageCompound() instead of
PageReserved()
Hi,
On 19.7.2023 9.31, Muchun Song wrote:
> The ckeck of PageReserved() is easy to be broken in the future, PageCompound()
> is more stable to check if the page should be split.
>
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
> ---
> mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
> index 4b9734777f69..8068fe890f52 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
> @@ -73,8 +73,10 @@ static int split_vmemmap_huge_pmd(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long start)
> * be treated as indepdenent small pages (as they can be freed
> * individually).
> */
> - if (!PageReserved(head))
> + if (PageCompound(head)) {
> + VM_BUG_ON(compound_order(head) != get_order(PMD_SIZE));
> split_page(head, get_order(PMD_SIZE));
I think vmemmap pages are not compound pages (even order > 0).
They would bug on here trying to split_page() :
void split_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
{
int i;
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageCompound(page), page);
> + }
>
> /* Make pte visible before pmd. See comment in pmd_install(). */
> smp_wmb();
--Mika
Powered by blists - more mailing lists