[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230719112136.GA1239020@pevik>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 13:21:36 +0200
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@...e.cz>
To: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@...e.cz>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>,
ltp@...ts.linux.it, Shile Zhang <shile.zhang@...ia.com>,
Shile Zhang <shile.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] sched/rt: Fix sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice intial
value
Hi,
[ Cc Shile Zhang ]
> Thre is 10% rounding error in the intial value of the
> sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice with CONFIG_HZ_300=y.
> This was found with LTP test sched_rr_get_interval01:
> sched_rr_get_interval01.c:57: TPASS: sched_rr_get_interval() passed
> sched_rr_get_interval01.c:64: TPASS: Time quantum 0s 99999990ns
> sched_rr_get_interval01.c:72: TFAIL: /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rr_timeslice_ms != 100 got 90
> sched_rr_get_interval01.c:57: TPASS: sched_rr_get_interval() passed
> sched_rr_get_interval01.c:64: TPASS: Time quantum 0s 99999990ns
> sched_rr_get_interval01.c:72: TFAIL: /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rr_timeslice_ms != 100 got 90
> What this test does is to compare the return value from the
> sched_rr_get_interval() and the sched_rr_timeslice_ms sysctl file and
> fails if they do not match.
> The prolem it found is the intial sysctl file value which was computed as:
> static int sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice = (MSEC_PER_SEC / HZ) * RR_TIMESLICE;
> which works fine as long as MSEC_PER_SEC is multiple of HZ, however it
> introduces 10% rounding error for CONFIG_HZ_300:
> (MSEC_PER_SEC / HZ) * (100 * HZ / 1000)
> (1000 / 300) * (100 * 300 / 1000)
> 3 * 30 = 90
> This can be easily fixed by reversing the order of the multiplication
> and division. After this fix we get:
> (MSEC_PER_SEC * (100 * HZ / 1000)) / HZ
> (1000 * (100 * 300 / 1000)) / 300
> (1000 * 30) / 300 = 100
> Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@...e.cz>
> CC: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>
> ---
> kernel/sched/rt.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> index 00e0e5074115..185d3d749f6b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ unsigned int sysctl_sched_rt_period = 1000000;
> int sysctl_sched_rt_runtime = 950000;
> #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
> -static int sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice = (MSEC_PER_SEC / HZ) * RR_TIMESLICE;
> +static int sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice = (MSEC_PER_SEC * RR_TIMESLICE) / HZ;
It looks like very old bug, from v4.11-rc1. I guess this should go to all stable
and LTS kernels.
Fixes: 975e155ed873 ("sched/rt: Show the 'sched_rr_timeslice' SCHED_RR timeslice tuning knob in milliseconds")
Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@...e.cz>
Kind regards,
Petr
> static int sched_rt_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void *buffer,
> size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos);
> static int sched_rr_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void *buffer,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists