lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 19 Jul 2023 21:35:47 +0800 (CST)
From:   "Zhang Bo" <zbsdta@....com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     paolo.valente@...more.it, axboe@...nel.dk
Subject: bfq io scheduler fifo_expire_sync have no function

In bfq_check_fifo(...) function,  bfq_bfqq_fifo_expire(bfqq) is checked at first, and then  bfq_mark_bfqq_fifo_expire(bfqq) later. 
I think bfq_check_fifo return NULL because of bfq_bfqq_fifo_expire(bfqq) return true. So expired request is not dispatch.
Could any one explain this problem?

static struct request *bfq_check_fifo(struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
				      struct request *last)
{
	struct request *rq;

	if (bfq_bfqq_fifo_expire(bfqq)) {
		return NULL;
	}

	bfq_mark_bfqq_fifo_expire(bfqq);

	...................
}

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ