[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230719142235.GA94215@ziqianlu-dell>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 22:22:35 +0800
From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
"Mel Gorman" <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
Nitin Tekchandani <nitin.tekchandani@...el.com>,
Yu Chen <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <yury.norov@...il.com>,
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
<rppt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] sched/fair: Make tg->load_avg per node
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 03:53:05PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 09:45:00PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > I'll rebase this per-node patch on top of below diff.
>
> Oh, please double check I didn't wreck anything. I skipped 'converting'
> the find_*_bit() functions because the users of those iterators might be
> expecting NR_MAXNODES when not found.
>
Sounds more work than I had expected :)
> But perhaps there's more I overlooked.
Got it, will see if I can make it work.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists