lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 19 Jul 2023 17:21:33 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@...cinc.com>,
        agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
        mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
        quic_eberman@...cinc.com, kvalo@...nel.org,
        loic.poulain@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     quic_srichara@...cinc.com, quic_sjaganat@...cinc.com,
        quic_kathirav@...cinc.com, quic_anusha@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [V3,02/11] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: gcc-ipq9574: remove q6 bring
 up clock macros

On 19/07/2023 17:11, Manikanta Mylavarapu wrote:
> 
> 
> On 7/19/2023 12:45 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 19/07/2023 09:14, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 18/07/2023 14:04, Manikanta Mylavarapu wrote:
>>>> In multipd model Q6 firmware takes care of bringup clocks,
>>>> so remove them.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@...cinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Changes in V3:
>>>> 	- Rebased on TOT
>>>
>>> No clue what is TOT. We have TIP, but you should not use it as a base.
>>> Other used names are mainline and linux-next.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>
>> Un-acked. I said last time that this does not compile and I do not see
>> any improvements here.
>>
> 
> My bad, i missed.
> 
> Is it fine to move gcc driver patch to first and then dt-bindings
> patch ?
> 
> With this way dt-bindings patch will compile.
> 
> Current patch order:
> -------------------
> 1) Removing clock macros from dt-bindigs
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/patch/20230718120501.3205661-3-quic_mmanikan@quicinc.com/
> 
> 2) Removing clocks from gcc driver
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/patch/20230718120501.3205661-5-quic_mmanikan@quicinc.com/
> 
> 
> Proposed patch order:
> ---------------------
> 1) Removing clocks from gcc driver
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/patch/20230718120501.3205661-5-quic_mmanikan@quicinc.com/
> 
> 2) Removing clock macros from dt-bindigs
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/patch/20230718120501.3205661-3-quic_mmanikan@quicinc.com/
> 

Yes, assuming there are no DTS users.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ