lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230719204553.46856b29@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 19 Jul 2023 20:45:53 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
        ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, hawk@...nel.org,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, xiaoning.wang@....com,
        shenwei.wang@....com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-imx@....com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: fec: add XDP_TX feature support

On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 18:37:09 +0800 Wei Fang wrote:
> -			xdp_return_frame(xdpf);
> +			if (txq->tx_buf[index].type == FEC_TXBUF_T_XDP_NDO)
> +				xdp_return_frame(xdpf);
> +			else
> +				xdp_return_frame_rx_napi(xdpf);

Are you taking budget into account? When NAPI is called with budget 
of 0 we are *not* in napi / softirq context. You can't be processing
any XDP tx under such conditions (it may be a netpoll call from IRQ
context).

> +static int fec_enet_xdp_tx_xmit(struct net_device *ndev,
> +				struct xdp_buff *xdp)
> +{
> +	struct xdp_frame *xdpf = xdp_convert_buff_to_frame(xdp);
> +	struct fec_enet_private *fep = netdev_priv(ndev);
> +	struct fec_enet_priv_tx_q *txq;
> +	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> +	struct netdev_queue *nq;
> +	int queue, ret;
> +
> +	queue = fec_enet_xdp_get_tx_queue(fep, cpu);
> +	txq = fep->tx_queue[queue];
> +	nq = netdev_get_tx_queue(fep->netdev, queue);
> +
> +	__netif_tx_lock(nq, cpu);
> +
> +	ret = fec_enet_txq_xmit_frame(fep, txq, xdpf, false);
> +
> +	__netif_tx_unlock(nq);

If you're reusing the same queues as the stack you need to call
txq_trans_cond_update() at some point, otherwise the stack may
print a splat complaining the queue got stuck.
-- 
pw-bot: cr

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ