[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230719204553.46856b29@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 20:45:53 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, hawk@...nel.org,
john.fastabend@...il.com, xiaoning.wang@....com,
shenwei.wang@....com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-imx@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: fec: add XDP_TX feature support
On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 18:37:09 +0800 Wei Fang wrote:
> - xdp_return_frame(xdpf);
> + if (txq->tx_buf[index].type == FEC_TXBUF_T_XDP_NDO)
> + xdp_return_frame(xdpf);
> + else
> + xdp_return_frame_rx_napi(xdpf);
Are you taking budget into account? When NAPI is called with budget
of 0 we are *not* in napi / softirq context. You can't be processing
any XDP tx under such conditions (it may be a netpoll call from IRQ
context).
> +static int fec_enet_xdp_tx_xmit(struct net_device *ndev,
> + struct xdp_buff *xdp)
> +{
> + struct xdp_frame *xdpf = xdp_convert_buff_to_frame(xdp);
> + struct fec_enet_private *fep = netdev_priv(ndev);
> + struct fec_enet_priv_tx_q *txq;
> + int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> + struct netdev_queue *nq;
> + int queue, ret;
> +
> + queue = fec_enet_xdp_get_tx_queue(fep, cpu);
> + txq = fep->tx_queue[queue];
> + nq = netdev_get_tx_queue(fep->netdev, queue);
> +
> + __netif_tx_lock(nq, cpu);
> +
> + ret = fec_enet_txq_xmit_frame(fep, txq, xdpf, false);
> +
> + __netif_tx_unlock(nq);
If you're reusing the same queues as the stack you need to call
txq_trans_cond_update() at some point, otherwise the stack may
print a splat complaining the queue got stuck.
--
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists