linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: sunxi: Add some defensiveness for regulators array

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdb6P1KjGWNnYWKoG+ZxFCLo7_06zjv_8CGMFoT9S44o1g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Jul 2023 21:33:15 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
        Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: sunxi: Add some defensiveness for regulators array

On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 7:20 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:

> The sunxi pinctrl has a fixed size array it uses to store regulators used
> in the driver. There is currently nothing that ensures that the number of
> elements in the array is large enough to map the regulators defined by the
> individual SoCs. While this is currently the case having an explicit check
> in there will make life easier for anyone debugging memory issues that
> manifest in the driver so let's add one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>

Patch applied.

Yours,
Linus Walleij