Message-ID: <0ab0b5a3-695e-742c-d9ef-c1b2503f3476@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Jul 2023 21:33:42 +0200
From:   Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>
To:     Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...i.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] firmware: Add support for Qualcomm UEFI Secure
 Application

On 6/29/23 14:12, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 01:03:51AM +0200, Maximilian Luz wrote:
>> On platforms using the Qualcomm UEFI Secure Application (uefisecapp),
>> EFI variables cannot be accessed via the standard interface in EFI
>> runtime mode. The respective functions return EFI_UNSUPPORTED. On these
>> platforms, we instead need to talk to uefisecapp. This commit provides
>> support for this and registers the respective efivars operations to
>> access EFI variables from the kernel.
>>
>> Communication with uefisecapp follows the Qualcomm QSEECOM / Secure OS
>> conventions via the respective SCM call interface. This is also the
>> reason why variable access works normally while boot services are
>> active. During this time, said SCM interface is managed by the boot
>> services. When calling ExitBootServices(), the ownership is transferred
>> to the kernel. Therefore, UEFI must not use that interface itself (as
>> multiple parties accessing this interface at the same time may lead to
>> complications) and cannot access variables for us.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v4:
>>   - Adapt to changes in DMA allocation in patch 3.
>>   - Rework alignment: Use native alignment of types instead of a general
>>     8 byte alignment. While the windows driver uses 8 byte alignment for
>>     GUIDs, the native (4 byte) alignment seems to work fine here.
>>   - Add a helper macro for determining size and layout of request and
>>     response buffers, taking care of proper alignment.
>>   - Implement support for EFI's query_variable_info() call, which is now
>>     supported by the kernel (and expected by efivarfs).
>>   - Move UCS-2 string helpers to lib/ucs2_string.c
> 
>> +config QCOM_QSEECOM_UEFISECAPP
>> +	tristate "Qualcomm SEE UEFI Secure App client driver"
>> +	select QCOM_SCM
>> +	select QCOM_SCM_QSEECOM
> 
> This should just be
> 
> 	depends on QCOM_SCM_QSEECOM
> 
> Using select should generally be avoided.

Okay.

>> +	depends on EFI
>> +	help
>> +	  Various Qualcomm SoCs do not allow direct access to EFI variables.
>> +	  Instead, these need to be accessed via the UEFI Secure Application
>> +	  (uefisecapp), residing in the Secure Execution Environment (SEE).
>> +
>> +	  This module provides a client driver for uefisecapp, installing efivar
>> +	  operations to allow the kernel accessing EFI variables, and via that also
>> +	  provide user-space with access to EFI variables via efivarfs.
>> +
>> +	  Select M or Y here to provide access to EFI variables on the
>> +	  aforementioned platforms.
> 
> We still have not really sorted how best to handle modular efivars
> implementations as userspace may try to mount efivarfs before the module
> has been loaded...
> 
> Perhaps require it to be built-in for now?

Sure, I can do that.

>> +
>>   config SYSFB
>>   	bool
>>   	select BOOT_VESA_SUPPORT
> 
>> +/* -- Alighment helpers ----------------------------------------------------- */
> 
> typo: Alignment

Oh, thanks for spotting that.
  
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Helper macro to ensure proper alignment of types (fields and arrays) when
>> + * stored in some (contiguous) buffer.
>> + *
>> + * Note: The driver from which this one has been reverse-engineered expects an
>> + * alignment of 8 bytes (64 bits) for GUIDs. Our definition of efi_guid_t,
>> + * however, has an alignment of 4 byte (32 bits). So far, this seems to work
>> + * fine here. See also the comment on the typedef of efi_guid_t.
>> + */
>> +#define qcuefi_buf_align_fields(fields...)					\
>> +	({									\
>> +		size_t __len = 0;						\
>> +		fields								\
>> +		__len;								\
>> +	})
>> +
>> +#define __field_impl(size, align, offset)					\
>> +	({									\
>> +		size_t *__offset = (offset);					\
>> +		size_t __aligned;						\
>> +										\
>> +		__aligned = ALIGN(__len, align);				\
>> +		__len = __aligned + (size);					\
>> +										\
>> +		if (__offset)							\
>> +			*__offset = __aligned;					\
>> +	});
>> +
>> +#define __array_offs(type, count, offset)					\
>> +	__field_impl(sizeof(type) * (count), __alignof__(type), offset)
>> +
>> +#define __array(type, count)		__array_offs(type, count, NULL)
>> +#define __field_offs(type, offset)	__array_offs(type, 1, offset)
>> +#define __field(type)			__array_offs(type, 1, NULL)
> 
> Heh. This is some nice macro magic. :)
> 
>> +static efi_status_t qsee_uefi_get_variable(struct qcuefi_client *qcuefi, const efi_char16_t *name,
>> +					   const efi_guid_t *guid, u32 *attributes,
>> +					   unsigned long *data_size, void *data)
>> +{
>> +	struct qsee_req_uefi_get_variable *req_data;
>> +	struct qsee_rsp_uefi_get_variable *rsp_data;
>> +	unsigned long buffer_size = *data_size;
>> +	efi_status_t efi_status = EFI_SUCCESS;
>> +	unsigned long name_length;
>> +	size_t guid_offs;
>> +	size_t name_offs;
>> +	size_t req_size;
>> +	size_t rsp_size;
>> +	int status;
>> +
>> +	/* Validation: We need a name and GUID. */
>> +	if (!name || !guid)
>> +		return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
>> +
>> +	/* Get length of name and ensure that the name is not truncated. */
>> +	name_length = ucs2_strnlen(name, QSEE_MAX_NAME_LEN) + 1;
>> +	if (name_length > QSEE_MAX_NAME_LEN)
>> +		return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
>> +
>> +	/* Validation: We need a buffer if the buffer_size is nonzero. */
>> +	if (buffer_size && !data)
>> +		return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
>> +
>> +	/* Compute required buffer size for request. */
>> +	req_size = qcuefi_buf_align_fields(
>> +		__field(*req_data)
>> +		__array_offs(*name, name_length, &name_offs)
>> +		__field_offs(*guid, &guid_offs)
>> +	);
>> +
>> +	/* Compute required buffer size for response. */
>> +	rsp_size = qcuefi_buf_align_fields(
>> +		__field(*rsp_data)
>> +		__array(u8, buffer_size)
>> +	);
>> +
>> +	/* Allocate request buffer. */
>> +	req_data = kzalloc(req_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!req_data) {
>> +		efi_status = EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES;
>> +		goto out;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* Allocate response buffer. */
>> +	rsp_data = kzalloc(rsp_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!rsp_data) {
>> +		efi_status = EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES;
>> +		goto out_free_req;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* Set up request data. */
>> +	req_data->command_id = QSEE_CMD_UEFI_GET_VARIABLE;
>> +	req_data->data_size = buffer_size;
>> +	req_data->name_offset = name_offs;
>> +	req_data->name_size = name_length * sizeof(*name);
>> +	req_data->guid_offset = guid_offs;
>> +	req_data->guid_size = sizeof(*guid);
>> +	req_data->length = req_size;
>> +
>> +	/* Copy request parameters. */
>> +	ucs2_strlcpy(((void *)req_data) + req_data->name_offset, name, name_length);
>> +	memcpy(((void *)req_data) + req_data->guid_offset, guid, req_data->guid_size);
>> +
>> +	/* Perform SCM call. */
>> +	status = qcom_scm_qseecom_app_send(qcuefi->client, req_data, req_size, rsp_data, rsp_size);
>> +
>> +	/* Check for errors and validate. */
>> +	if (status) {
>> +		efi_status = EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;
>> +		goto out_free;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (rsp_data->command_id != QSEE_CMD_UEFI_GET_VARIABLE) {
>> +		efi_status = EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;
>> +		goto out_free;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (rsp_data->length < sizeof(*rsp_data)) {
>> +		efi_status = EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;
>> +		goto out_free;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (rsp_data->status) {
>> +		dev_dbg(qcuefi_dev(qcuefi), "%s: uefisecapp error: 0x%x\n",
>> +			__func__, rsp_data->status);
>> +		efi_status = qsee_uefi_status_to_efi(rsp_data->status);
>> +
>> +		/* Update size and attributes in case buffer is too small. */
>> +		if (efi_status == EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL) {
>> +			*data_size = rsp_data->data_size;
>> +			if (attributes)
>> +				*attributes = rsp_data->attributes;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		goto out_free;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (rsp_data->length > rsp_size) {
>> +		efi_status = EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;
>> +		goto out_free;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (rsp_data->data_offset + rsp_data->data_size > rsp_data->length) {
>> +		efi_status = EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;
>> +		goto out_free;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* Set attributes and data size even if buffer is too small. */
>> +	*data_size = rsp_data->data_size;
>> +	if (attributes)
>> +		*attributes = rsp_data->attributes;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * If we have a buffer size of zero and no buffer, just return
>> +	 * attributes and required size.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (buffer_size == 0 && !data) {
>> +		efi_status = EFI_SUCCESS;
>> +		goto out_free;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* Validate output buffer size. */
>> +	if (buffer_size < rsp_data->data_size) {
>> +		efi_status = EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL;
>> +		goto out_free;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* Copy to output buffer. Note: We're guaranteed to have one at this point. */
>> +	memcpy(data, ((void *)rsp_data) + rsp_data->data_offset, rsp_data->data_size);
>> +
>> +out_free:
>> +	kfree(rsp_data);
>> +out_free_req:
>> +	kfree(req_data);
>> +out:
>> +	return efi_status;
>> +}
> 
> The above reads very easily as it stands, but generally we try to avoid
> adding comments inside functions unless doing something unexpected or
> similar.
> 
> Comments like "Allocate response buffer" and "Perform SCM call" should
> not be needed as it should be clear from the code (given apt names of
> variables and function which you already seem to have chosen).

Okay, I'll drop those.

>> +/* -- Global efivar interface. ---------------------------------------------- */
>> +
>> +static struct qcuefi_client *__qcuefi;
>> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(__qcuefi_lock);
>> +
>> +static int qcuefi_set_reference(struct qcuefi_client *qcuefi)
>> +{
>> +	mutex_lock(&__qcuefi_lock);
>> +
>> +	if (qcuefi && __qcuefi) {
>> +		mutex_unlock(&__qcuefi_lock);
>> +		return -EEXIST;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	__qcuefi = qcuefi;
>> +
>> +	mutex_unlock(&__qcuefi_lock);
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct qcuefi_client *qcuefi_acquire(void)
>> +	__acquires(&__qcuefi_lock)
> 
> I noticed that someone told you to add sparse annotation here but that
> was not correct.
> 
> The mutex implementation does not use sparse annotation so this actually
> introduces sparse warnings such as:
> 
> /home/johan/work/linaro/src/linux/drivers/firmware/qcom_qseecom_uefisecapp.c:741:29: warning: context imbalance in 'qcuefi_acquire' - wrong count at exit
> 
> Just drop the annotation again.

Sure, will do. I might also want to look into actually running sparse at
some point I guess...
  
>> +{
>> +	mutex_lock(&__qcuefi_lock);
>> +	return __qcuefi;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void qcuefi_release(void)
>> +	__releases(&__qcuefi_lock)
>> +{
>> +	mutex_unlock(&__qcuefi_lock);
>> +}
> 
>> +static int qcom_uefisecapp_probe(struct auxiliary_device *aux_dev,
>> +				 const struct auxiliary_device_id *aux_dev_id)
>> +{
>> +	struct qcuefi_client *qcuefi;
>> +	int status;
>> +
>> +	/* Allocate driver data. */
> 
> As mentioned above, I suggest dropping comments like this throughout.

Sure.
  
>> +	qcuefi = devm_kzalloc(&aux_dev->dev, sizeof(*qcuefi), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!qcuefi)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	qcuefi->client = container_of(aux_dev, struct qseecom_client, aux_dev);
>> +
>> +	/* Register global reference. */
>> +	auxiliary_set_drvdata(aux_dev, qcuefi);
>> +	status = qcuefi_set_reference(qcuefi);
>> +	if (status)
>> +		return status;
>> +
>> +	/* Register efivar ops. */
>> +	status = efivars_register(&qcuefi->efivars, &qcom_efivar_ops);
>> +	if (status)
>> +		qcuefi_set_reference(NULL);
>> +
>> +	return status;
>> +}

Again, thanks for the review and the patience. I'll try to prepare a new
version over the weekend.

Regards
Max

Powered by blists - more mailing lists