[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYBNOWC1NfBd6dXCFrP3zRK3kDeL_H=HyfFk=e1bko=eA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 21:38:49 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Clean up LPASS_LPI probe
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 2:40 PM Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org> wrote:
> Some SoCs (like SM6115 or SC7280 with various firmwares) expect a single
> clock for the LPASS pinctrl.
>
> This serires addresses that by simplifying the probe code and relying
> on bindings to sanction the correct number of clocks. That allows us to
> shoot down another downstream-ism.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Patch 1 & 2 applied to the pinctrl tree, please funnel patch 3 through
the SoC tree.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists