| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-id: <168988958067.11078.10143293324143654882@noble.neil.brown.name>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 07:46:20 +1000
From: "NeilBrown" <neilb@...e.de>
To: "Jeff Layton" <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc: "Chuck Lever" <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
"Olga Kornievskaia" <kolga@...app.com>,
"Dai Ngo" <Dai.Ngo@...cle.com>, "Tom Talpey" <tom@...pey.com>,
"Boyang Xue" <bxue@...hat.com>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Jeff Layton" <jlayton@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] nfsd: handle failure to collect pre/post-op attrs
more sanely
On Fri, 21 Jul 2023, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Collecting pre_op_attrs can fail, in which case it's probably best to
> fail the whole operation.
>
> Change fh_fill_{pre,post,both}_attrs to return __be32. For the pre and
> both functions, have the callers check the return code and abort the
> operation if it failed.
>
> If fh_fill_post_attrs fails, then it's too late to do anything about it,
> so most of those callers ignore the return value. If this happens, then
> fh_post_saved will be false, which should cue the later stages to deal
> with it.
>
> Suggested-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c | 4 +++-
> fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c | 14 ++++++------
> fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c | 26 ++++++++++++++---------
> fs/nfsd/nfsfh.h | 6 +++---
> fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 5 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c
> index fc8d5b7db9f8..268ef57751c4 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c
> @@ -307,7 +307,9 @@ nfsd3_create_file(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
> if (!IS_POSIXACL(inode))
> iap->ia_mode &= ~current_umask();
>
> - fh_fill_pre_attrs(fhp);
> + status = fh_fill_pre_attrs(fhp);
> + if (status != nfs_ok)
> + goto out;
> host_err = vfs_create(&nop_mnt_idmap, inode, child, iap->ia_mode, true);
> if (host_err < 0) {
> status = nfserrno(host_err);
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> index d8e7a533f9d2..9285e1eab4d5 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> @@ -297,12 +297,12 @@ nfsd4_create_file(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
> }
>
> if (d_really_is_positive(child)) {
> - status = nfs_ok;
> -
> /* NFSv4 protocol requires change attributes even though
> * no change happened.
> */
> - fh_fill_both_attrs(fhp);
> + status = fh_fill_both_attrs(fhp);
> + if (status != nfs_ok)
> + goto out;
>
> switch (open->op_createmode) {
> case NFS4_CREATE_UNCHECKED:
> @@ -345,7 +345,9 @@ nfsd4_create_file(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
> if (!IS_POSIXACL(inode))
> iap->ia_mode &= ~current_umask();
>
> - fh_fill_pre_attrs(fhp);
> + status = fh_fill_pre_attrs(fhp);
> + if (status != nfs_ok)
> + goto out;
> status = nfsd4_vfs_create(fhp, child, open);
> if (status != nfs_ok)
> goto out;
> @@ -424,11 +426,11 @@ do_open_lookup(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate, stru
> } else {
> status = nfsd_lookup(rqstp, current_fh,
> open->op_fname, open->op_fnamelen, *resfh);
> - if (!status)
> + if (status == nfs_ok)
> /* NFSv4 protocol requires change attributes even though
> * no change happened.
> */
> - fh_fill_both_attrs(current_fh);
> + status = fh_fill_both_attrs(current_fh);
> }
> if (status)
> goto out;
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c b/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c
> index c291389a1d71..f7e68a91e826 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c
> @@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ fh_update(struct svc_fh *fhp)
> * @fhp: file handle to be updated
> *
> */
> -void fh_fill_pre_attrs(struct svc_fh *fhp)
> +__be32 fh_fill_pre_attrs(struct svc_fh *fhp)
> {
> bool v4 = (fhp->fh_maxsize == NFS4_FHSIZE);
> struct inode *inode;
> @@ -622,12 +622,12 @@ void fh_fill_pre_attrs(struct svc_fh *fhp)
> __be32 err;
>
> if (fhp->fh_no_wcc || fhp->fh_pre_saved)
> - return;
> + return nfs_ok;
>
> inode = d_inode(fhp->fh_dentry);
> err = fh_getattr(fhp, &stat);
> if (err)
> - return;
> + return err;
>
> if (v4)
> fhp->fh_pre_change = nfsd4_change_attribute(&stat, inode);
> @@ -636,6 +636,7 @@ void fh_fill_pre_attrs(struct svc_fh *fhp)
> fhp->fh_pre_ctime = stat.ctime;
> fhp->fh_pre_size = stat.size;
> fhp->fh_pre_saved = true;
> + return nfs_ok;
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -643,26 +644,27 @@ void fh_fill_pre_attrs(struct svc_fh *fhp)
> * @fhp: file handle to be updated
> *
> */
> -void fh_fill_post_attrs(struct svc_fh *fhp)
> +__be32 fh_fill_post_attrs(struct svc_fh *fhp)
> {
> bool v4 = (fhp->fh_maxsize == NFS4_FHSIZE);
> struct inode *inode = d_inode(fhp->fh_dentry);
> __be32 err;
>
> if (fhp->fh_no_wcc)
> - return;
> + return nfs_ok;
>
> if (fhp->fh_post_saved)
> printk("nfsd: inode locked twice during operation.\n");
>
> err = fh_getattr(fhp, &fhp->fh_post_attr);
> if (err)
> - return;
> + return err;
>
> fhp->fh_post_saved = true;
> if (v4)
> fhp->fh_post_change =
> nfsd4_change_attribute(&fhp->fh_post_attr, inode);
> + return nfs_ok;
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -672,16 +674,20 @@ void fh_fill_post_attrs(struct svc_fh *fhp)
> * This is used when the directory wasn't changed, but wcc attributes
> * are needed anyway.
> */
> -void fh_fill_both_attrs(struct svc_fh *fhp)
> +__be32 fh_fill_both_attrs(struct svc_fh *fhp)
> {
> - fh_fill_post_attrs(fhp);
> - if (!fhp->fh_post_saved)
> - return;
> + __be32 err;
> +
> + err = fh_fill_post_attrs(fhp);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> fhp->fh_pre_change = fhp->fh_post_change;
> fhp->fh_pre_mtime = fhp->fh_post_attr.mtime;
> fhp->fh_pre_ctime = fhp->fh_post_attr.ctime;
> fhp->fh_pre_size = fhp->fh_post_attr.size;
> fhp->fh_pre_saved = true;
> + return nfs_ok;
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.h b/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.h
> index 4e0ecf0ae2cf..486803694acc 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.h
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.h
> @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static inline void fh_clear_pre_post_attrs(struct svc_fh *fhp)
> }
>
> u64 nfsd4_change_attribute(struct kstat *stat, struct inode *inode);
> -extern void fh_fill_pre_attrs(struct svc_fh *fhp);
> -extern void fh_fill_post_attrs(struct svc_fh *fhp);
> -extern void fh_fill_both_attrs(struct svc_fh *fhp);
> +__be32 fh_fill_pre_attrs(struct svc_fh *fhp);
> +__be32 fh_fill_post_attrs(struct svc_fh *fhp);
> +__be32 fh_fill_both_attrs(struct svc_fh *fhp);
> #endif /* _LINUX_NFSD_NFSFH_H */
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> index 8a2321d19194..f200afd33630 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> @@ -1537,9 +1537,11 @@ nfsd_create(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
> dput(dchild);
> if (err)
> goto out_unlock;
> - fh_fill_pre_attrs(fhp);
> - err = nfsd_create_locked(rqstp, fhp, attrs, type, rdev, resfhp);
> - fh_fill_post_attrs(fhp);
> + err = fh_fill_pre_attrs(fhp);
> + if (err == nfs_ok) {
> + err = nfsd_create_locked(rqstp, fhp, attrs, type, rdev, resfhp);
> + fh_fill_post_attrs(fhp);
Most error handling in nfsd is
if (err)
goto ....
Here (and one other place I think) you have
if (not err)
do stuff;
Do we want to be more consistent? I'm in two minds about this and I
don't dislike your patch. But I noticed the inconsistency and thought I
should mention it.
Also, should we put a __must_check annotation on fh_fill_pre_attrs() and
..post..? Then I wouldn't have to manually check that you found and
fixed all callers (which I haven't).
Thanks,
NeilBrown
Powered by blists - more mailing lists