[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230720060742.GA2987@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 08:07:42 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma: DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC documentation tweaks
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 06:15:59AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> A recent patchset highlighted to me that DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC
> might be easily misunderstood.
.. just curious: what patchset is that? DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC is
often a bad idea and all users probably could use a really good
audit..
> #define DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING (1UL << 4)
> /*
> - * DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC: Allows platform code to skip synchronization of
> - * the CPU cache for the given buffer assuming that it has been already
> - * transferred to 'device' domain.
> + * DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC: Allows platform code to skip synchronization of the
> + * CPU and device domains for the given buffer.
While we're at it, I think "allows" is the wrong word here, we really
must skip the synchronization or else we're in trouble.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists