linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mfd: qcom-pm8xxx: Fix potential deadlock on &chip->pm_irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAo+4rVA-1jq34K8Rk061fsH=bPbamB2uEemzJh6pj7RNdRt7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Jul 2023 15:24:30 +0800
From:   Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@...il.com>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>, lee@...nel.org,
        agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: qcom-pm8xxx: Fix potential deadlock on &chip->pm_irq_lock

 > You are correct, so please drop "I think", and change "should be" to
> "are generally"
>  I don't think this is a "tentative patch fix", it is the patch to fix
> the issue. I think you can omit this line, because you already described
> your problem, and the solution above.
The V2 patch was just sent to address the problem.

> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>
Also thanks for your time in reviewing the patch :)

> No, I need you to resubmit it with more historical people on Cc please.
Thanks for the reminder, I Cc more people with large contributions to the
file in the V2 patch.

Best Regards,
Chengfeng