[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7e1124a15395dbb6906c17e240e5011a4274a9b5.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 07:52:40 +0000
From: CK Hu (胡俊光) <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
To: "fshao@...omium.org" <fshao@...omium.org>
CC: "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Singo Chang (張興國)
<Singo.Chang@...iatek.com>,
"chunkuang.hu@...nel.org" <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
Nancy Lin (林欣螢) <Nancy.Lin@...iatek.com>,
"p.zabel@...gutronix.de" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group
<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com"
<clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/mediatek: fix uninitialized symbol
Hi, Fei:
On Mon, 2023-07-17 at 11:59 +0800, Fei Shao wrote:
>
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
> Hi CK,
>
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 5:27 PM CK Hu (胡俊光) <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Nancy:
> >
> > On Fri, 2023-04-21 at 10:16 +0800, Nancy.Lin wrote:
> snip
> >
> > In line 566, the statement is
> >
> > if (nodo) {
> > comp_pdev = ...
> > }
> >
> > The comment says that only ovl_adaptoer has no device node, so the
> > checking should be
> >
> > if (type != MTK_DISP_OVL_ADAPTOR) {
> > comp_pdev = ...
> > }
> >
> > and later it would return when type = MTK_DISP_OVL_ADAPTOR,
> > so there would be no problem of uninitialized symbol.
>
> That sounds fair, but IIUC what Nancy tries to resolve here is the
> false-positive Smatch warning.
> How about this: given the `if (node)` block was exclusively added for
> ovl_adaptor in [1], plus the init function will immediately return
> after that in this case, it should be safe to do the following
>
> ```
> /* Not all drm components have a DTS device node... */
> if (node == NULL)
> return 0;
>
> comp_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(node);
> ...
>
> if (type == MTK_DISP_AAL ||
> ...
> ```
>
> which is equivalent to adding a `node == NULL` check before [1].
> This should suppress the Smatch warning because `comp_pdev` will be
> (again) unconditionally assigned to something, and the `type ==
> MTK_DISP_OVL_ADAPTOR` line can be dropped also (optional?).
This solution also looks good to me.
Regards,
CK
>
> [1]: commit 0d9eee9118b7 ("drm/mediatek: Add drm ovl_adaptor sub
> driver for MT8195")
>
> Regards,
> Fei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists