linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/11] drm: kunit: Switch to kunit actions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <niypycsz25r4ywlxeula3cc3padis74hr5gbr2rjw4hrxag7my@f55p7c3unf7o>
Date:   Thu, 20 Jul 2023 10:19:43 +0200
From:   Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
To:     suijingfeng <suijingfeng@...ngson.cn>
Cc:     David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        Emma Anholt <emma@...olt.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] drm: kunit: Switch to kunit actions

Hi,

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 11:24:13PM +0800, suijingfeng wrote:
> On 2023/7/10 15:47, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Since v6.5-rc1, kunit gained a devm/drmm-like mechanism that makes tests
> > resources much easier to cleanup.
> > 
> > This series converts the existing tests to use those new actions were
> > relevant.
> 
> Is the word 'were' here means that 'where' relevant ?

Yes :)

> Or it is means that it were relevant, after applied you patch it is not
> relevant anymore ?
> 
> > Let me know what you think,
> > Maxime
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > Maxime Ripard (11):
> >        drm/tests: helpers: Switch to kunit actions
> >        drm/tests: client-modeset: Remove call to drm_kunit_helper_free_device()
> >        drm/tests: modes: Remove call to drm_kunit_helper_free_device()
> >        drm/tests: probe-helper: Remove call to drm_kunit_helper_free_device()
> >        drm/tests: helpers: Create an helper to allocate a locking ctx
> >        drm/tests: helpers: Create an helper to allocate an atomic state
> 
> a helper or an helper ?
> 
> Should this two patch be re-titled as following ?
> 
> I search it on the internet[1], mostly using a helper.
> 
> 
>       drm/tests: helpers: Create a helper to allocate a locking ctx
>       drm/tests: helpers: Create a helper to allocate an atomic state
> 
> [1] https://www.a-or-an.com/a_an/helper
> 
> Sorry about the noise if I'm wrong.

You're right, I'll fix it

Thanks!
Maxime

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)