linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: document AL02-Cx and AL03-C2 boards based on IPQ9574 family

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87c3a3db-d172-bc98-cf83-89b874c9fee7@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 20 Jul 2023 10:49:51 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Sridharan S N <quic_sridsn@...cinc.com>, agross@...nel.org,
        andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: document AL02-Cx and AL03-C2
 boards based on IPQ9574 family

On 20/07/2023 10:45, Sridharan S N wrote:
> Document the below listed (Reference Design Platform) RDP boards based on IPQ9574
> family of SoCs.
> 
> AL02-C3  - rdp437
> AL02-C7  - rdp433-mht-phy
> AL02-C10 - rdp433-mht-switch
> AL02-C11 - rdp467
> AL02-C12 - rdp455
> AL02-C13 - rdp459
> AL02-C15 - rdp457
> AL02-C16 - rdp456
> AL02-C17 - rdp469
> AL02-C19 - rdp461
> AL03-C2  - rdp458
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sridharan S N <quic_sridsn@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml         | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> index dd66fd872c31..d992261da691 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> @@ -89,10 +89,20 @@ description: |
>          adp
>          ap-al01-c1
>          ap-al02-c2
> +        ap-al02-c3
>          ap-al02-c6
>          ap-al02-c7
>          ap-al02-c8
>          ap-al02-c9
> +        ap-al02-c10
> +        ap-al02-c11
> +        ap-al02-c12
> +        ap-al02-c13
> +        ap-al02-c15
> +        ap-al02-c16
> +        ap-al02-c17
> +        ap-al02-c19

Why? I asked once, but there was no feedback from Qualcomm.

Why do we need to do this? What's the point?

> +        ap-al03-c2
>          ap-mi01.2
>          ap-mi01.3
>          ap-mi01.6
> @@ -365,10 +375,20 @@ properties:
>            - enum:
>                - qcom,ipq9574-ap-al01-c1
>                - qcom,ipq9574-ap-al02-c2
> +              - qcom,ipq9574-ap-al02-c3
>                - qcom,ipq9574-ap-al02-c6
>                - qcom,ipq9574-ap-al02-c7
>                - qcom,ipq9574-ap-al02-c8
>                - qcom,ipq9574-ap-al02-c9
> +              - qcom,ipq9574-ap-al02-c10
> +              - qcom,ipq9574-ap-al02-c11
> +              - qcom,ipq9574-ap-al02-c12
> +              - qcom,ipq9574-ap-al02-c13
> +              - qcom,ipq9574-ap-al02-c15
> +              - qcom,ipq9574-ap-al02-c16
> +              - qcom,ipq9574-ap-al02-c17
> +              - qcom,ipq9574-ap-al02-c19

This looks fake. Sorry, but these boards have no differences.

Best regards,
Krzysztof