lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8194aa14-6465-5b4d-1b13-72c6af818f82@quicinc.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Jul 2023 15:25:20 +0530
From:   Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>
To:     Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <agross@...nel.org>,
        <andersson@...nel.org>, <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        <robh@...nel.org>, <mani@...nel.org>, <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
        <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, <kw@...ux.com>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] PCI: qcom: Fixing broken pcie bring up for 2_3_3
 configs ops



On 7/17/2023 11:23 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 at 20:16, Sricharan Ramabadhran
> <quic_srichara@...cinc.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7/17/2023 7:09 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 12:25:35PM +0530, Sricharan Ramabadhran wrote:
>>>> PARF_SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE_2_3_3 macro is used for IPQ8074
>>>> 2_3_3 post_init ops. PCIe slave addr size was initially set
>>>> to 0x358, but was wrongly changed to 0x168 as a part of
>>>> commit 39171b33f652 ("PCI: qcom: Remove PCIE20_ prefix from
>>>> register definitions"). Fixing it, by using the right macro
>>>> PARF_SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE and remove the unused
>>>> PARF_SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE_2_3_3.
>>>
>>> Note, you do have a full 72 columns to use, no need to make it smaller.
>>
>>    ok sure
>>
>>>
>>>> Without this pcie bring up on IPQ8074 is broken now.
>>>
>>> I do not understand, something that used to work now breaks, or this is
>>> preventing a new chip from being "brought up"?
>>>
>>
>>    yes, ipq8074 pcie which was previously working is broken now.
>>    This patch fixes it.
> 
> So, you need to describe what is broken and why. Mere "it is broken,
> fix it" is not enough.

  ok sure, will change the subject and explicitly state in commit log
  how pcie enumeration is broken up.


Regards,
  Sricharan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ