[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <281c5d5e51488ce51497072c1e4304d71af141ec.camel@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 01:34:55 +0000
From: donmor <donmor3000@...mail.com>
To: "Markus.Elfring@....de" <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
"chenhuacai@...nel.org" <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
"kernel@...0n.name" <kernel@...0n.name>
CC: "kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
"jiaxun.yang@...goat.com" <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
"loongarch@...ts.linux.dev" <loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>,
"chenhuacai@...ngson.cn" <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>,
"guoren@...nel.org" <guoren@...nel.org>,
"lixuefeng@...ngson.cn" <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"loongson-kernel@...ts.loongnix.cn"
<loongson-kernel@...ts.loongnix.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] LoongArch: Fix CONFIG_CMDLINE_EXTEND and
CONFIG_CMDLINE_BOOTLOADER handling
在 2023-07-19星期三的 18:29 +0800,WANG Xuerui写道:
> On 2023/7/19 15:22, Huacai Chen wrote:
> > Hi, Markus,
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 2:51 PM Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de> wrote:
> > > > …, so this patch add
> > > > some code to fix it.
> > >
> > > Would you like to avoid a typo here?
> > >
> > > Will any other imperative change description variant become more helpful?
> > Thank you for pointing this out, but since Zhihong is the original
> > author, I don't want to completely rewrite the commit message, so just
> > fix the typo...
>
> AFAICT the commit message is totally uninformative even if "an
> imperative change description" were used. It basically:
>
> 1. repeated the patch title,
> 2. spent one sentence only for mentioning a function name without giving
> any more information,
> 3. mentioned why some change was not necessary due to some other
> existing code, but not explicitly calling that part out, then
> 4. finished with a sentence that boiled down to "we should do the
> similar thing".
>
> My take:
>
> > Subject: Fix CMDLINE_EXTEND and CMDLINE_BOOTLOADER on non-FDT systems
> >
> > On FDT systems these command line processing are already taken care of
> > by early_init_dt_scan_chosen(). Add similar handling to the non-FDT
> > code path to allow these config options to work for non-FDT boxes too.
>
> Would this sound better?
>
Xuerui's take is fine. Do I need to make a v6 patch?
donmor
Powered by blists - more mailing lists