lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MfbWjWTdU4ToFMp_ZV6eGdRnjD--Y+qsN329TsLFGQYxg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Jul 2023 14:56:32 +0200
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To:     Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Ying Liu <victor.liu@....com>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "lee@...nel.org" <lee@...nel.org>,
        "jingoohan1@...il.com" <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
        "deller@....de" <deller@....de>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] backlight: gpio_backlight: Drop output gpio direction
 check for initial power state

On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 1:27 PM Daniel Thompson
<daniel.thompson@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 06:06:27AM +0000, Ying Liu wrote:
> > Bootloader may leave gpio direction as input and gpio value as logical low.
> > It hints that initial backlight power state should be FB_BLANK_POWERDOWN
> > since the gpio value is literally logical low.
>
> To be honest this probably "hints" that the bootloader simply didn't
> consider the backlight at all :-) . I'd rather the patch description
> focus on what circumstances lead to the current code making a bad
> decision. More like:
>
>   If the GPIO pin is in the input state but the backlight is currently
>   off due to default pull downs then ...
>
> > So, let's drop output gpio
> > direction check and only check gpio value to set the initial power state.
>
> This check was specifically added by Bartosz so I'd be interested in his
> opinion of this change (especially since he is now a GPIO maintainer)!
>
> What motivates (or motivated) the need to check the direction rather
> than just read that current logic level on the pin?
>
>
> Daniel.
> [I'm done but since Bartosz and Linus were not on copy of the original
> thread I've left the rest of the patch below as a convenience ;-) ]
>

This was done in commit: 706dc68102bc ("backlight: gpio: Explicitly
set the direction of the GPIO").

Let me quote myself from it:

--
The GPIO backlight driver currently requests the line 'as is', without
actively setting its direction. This can lead to problems: if the line
is in input mode by default, we won't be able to drive it later when
updating the status and also reading its initial value doesn't make
sense for backlight setting.
--

I agree with Thomas that it's highly unlikely the bootloader "hints"
at any specific backlight settings. That being said, the change itself
looks correct to me. The other branch of that if will always unblank
the backlight if the GPIO is in input mode which may not be desirable.
I don't see any obvious problem with this change, just make sure the
commit message makes more sense.

Bartosz

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ