lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3f5b8483-5a84-a41d-99b6-3c7a0c95b4e5@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Thu, 20 Jul 2023 06:25:43 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Thomas R <seatommyboy@...il.com>, jdelvare@...e.com,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Driver for Nuvoton NCT6687D eSIO chip

On 7/20/23 04:09, Thomas R wrote:
> To whom it may concern,
> 
> I am trying to submit a patch for driver Driver for Nuvoton NCT6687D eSIO chip under drivers/hwmon. This driver is confirmed to be working for motherboards series B550 and B650.
> 
> Credits for creating this driver should go to Frederic BOLTZ https://github.com/Fred78290/nct6687d
> 
> Attached is my patch


This is not the way to submit patches into the Linux kernel.

Anyway, this is pretty much just taking the existing nct6683 driver,
extending it with an additional ID for NCT6687 (0xd451), removing
customer ID checks, and claiming new authorship. No, this is not how
kernel development works. If those motherboards use an NCT6687 with
ID 0xd451, or if the boards use a new customer ID, submit patches updating
the existing driver. If there are other changes improving the existing
driver, submit patches for it. I am not going to accept a second driver
for the same chip.

Guenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ