[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <61bbb2e6-8c18-d2fc-ce1e-78d462ac1bba@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 22:54:01 +0800
From: Jiaqing Zhao <jiaqing.zhao@...ux.intel.com>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
Gerhard Uttenthaler <uttenthaler@...-wuensche.com>,
support@...-wuensche.com,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] can: ems_pci: move ASIX AX99100 ids to pci_ids.h
On 2023-07-20 18:40, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 20.07.2023 10:28:59, Jiaqing Zhao wrote:
>> Move PCI Vendor and Device ID of ASIX AX99100 PCIe to Multi I/O
>> Controller to pci_ids.h for its serial and parallel port driver
>> support in subsequent patches.
>
> Sorry, I haven't noticed the change in "include/linux/pci_ids.h", that
> the other patches depend on. How to coordinate among the subsystems?
>
> I don't mind taking the entire (v1) series with the Acks from the
> tty/serial and parport maintainers, or give my Acked-by to upstream
> via their trees.
Add tty and parport maintainers to this thread.
I'd like to ask other maintainers' opinion as I'm not sure which option
is better and I had no similar experience before.
>> Signed-off-by: Jiaqing Zhao <jiaqing.zhao@...ux.intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
>> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/can/sja1000/ems_pci.c | 6 +-----
>> include/linux/pci_ids.h | 4 ++++
>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> Marc
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists