[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <87v8edjmfc.fsf@doe.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 21:18:07 +0530
From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@...il.com>
To: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>, tytso@....edu,
adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: shikemeng@...weicloud.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] ext4: return found group directly in ext4_mb_choose_next_group_best_avail
Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com> writes:
> Return good group when it's found in loop to remove futher check if good
> group is found after loop.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 18 ++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
Looks good to me. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@...il.com>
-ritesh
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> index 6f8e804905d5..b04eceeab967 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> @@ -1043,18 +1043,16 @@ static void ext4_mb_choose_next_group_best_avail(struct ext4_allocation_context
> ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len);
>
> grp = ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists(ac, frag_order);
> - if (grp)
> - break;
> + if (grp) {
> + *group = grp->bb_group;
> + ac->ac_flags |= EXT4_MB_CR_BEST_AVAIL_LEN_OPTIMIZED;
> + return;
> + }
> }
>
> - if (grp) {
> - *group = grp->bb_group;
> - ac->ac_flags |= EXT4_MB_CR_BEST_AVAIL_LEN_OPTIMIZED;
> - } else {
> - /* Reset goal length to original goal length before falling into CR_GOAL_LEN_SLOW */
> - ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len = ac->ac_orig_goal_len;
> - *new_cr = CR_GOAL_LEN_SLOW;
> - }
> + /* Reset goal length to original goal length before falling into CR_GOAL_LEN_SLOW */
> + ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len = ac->ac_orig_goal_len;
> + *new_cr = CR_GOAL_LEN_SLOW;
> }
>
> static inline int should_optimize_scan(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
> --
> 2.30.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists