linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] iio: core: Add opaque_struct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZLq+2+9q6To3uAkf@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Jul 2023 20:22:35 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@...log.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] iio: core: Add opaque_struct_size() helper and
 use it

On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 08:00:15PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Introduce opaque_struct_size() helper, which may be moved
> to overflow.h in the future, and use it in the IIO core.

...

> +#define opaque_struct_size(p, a, s)	({		\
> +	size_t _psize = sizeof(*(p));			\
> +	size_t _asize = ALIGN(_psize, (a));		\
> +	size_t _ssize = s;				\
> +	_ssize ? size_add(_asize, _ssize) : _psize;	\
> +})
> +
> +#define opaque_struct_data(p, a)			\
> +	((void *)(p) + ALIGN(sizeof(*(p)), (a)))

Hmm... This can potentially evaluate p twice.

Perhaps this variant is better:

#define opaque_struct_data(p, a)	ALIGN((p) + 1, (a)))

Besides, I don't think we should worry about @s evaluation in the main macro
which may be simplified to

#define opaque_struct_size(p, a, s)					\
	((s) ? size_add(ALIGN(sizeof(*(p)), (a)), (s)) : sizeof(*(p)))

Thoughts?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko