linux-kernel - [PATCH] Fix BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in trace_event_raw_event_filelock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230721051904.9317-1-Will.Shiu@mediatek.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Jul 2023 13:19:04 +0800
From:   Will Shiu <Will.Shiu@...iatek.com>
To:     Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
CC:     Will Shiu <Will.Shiu@...iatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Fix BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in trace_event_raw_event_filelock_lock

As following backtrace, the struct file_lock request , in posix_lock_inode
is free before ftrace function using.
Replace the ftrace function ahead free flow could fix the use-after-free
issue.

[name:report&]===============================================
BUG:KASAN: use-after-free in trace_event_raw_event_filelock_lock+0x80/0x12c
[name:report&]Read at addr f6ffff8025622620 by task NativeThread/16753
[name:report_hw_tags&]Pointer tag: [f6], memory tag: [fe]
[name:report&]
BT:
Hardware name: MT6897 (DT)
Call trace:
 dump_backtrace+0xf8/0x148
 show_stack+0x18/0x24
 dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x7c
 print_report+0x2c8/0xa08
 kasan_report+0xb0/0x120
 __do_kernel_fault+0xc8/0x248
 do_bad_area+0x30/0xdc
 do_tag_check_fault+0x1c/0x30
 do_mem_abort+0x58/0xbc
 el1_abort+0x3c/0x5c
 el1h_64_sync_handler+0x54/0x90
 el1h_64_sync+0x68/0x6c
 trace_event_raw_event_filelock_lock+0x80/0x12c
 posix_lock_inode+0xd0c/0xd60
 do_lock_file_wait+0xb8/0x190
 fcntl_setlk+0x2d8/0x440
...
[name:report&]
[name:report&]Allocated by task 16752:
...
 slab_post_alloc_hook+0x74/0x340
 kmem_cache_alloc+0x1b0/0x2f0
 posix_lock_inode+0xb0/0xd60
...
 [name:report&]
 [name:report&]Freed by task 16752:
...
  kmem_cache_free+0x274/0x5b0
  locks_dispose_list+0x3c/0x148
  posix_lock_inode+0xc40/0xd60
  do_lock_file_wait+0xb8/0x190
  fcntl_setlk+0x2d8/0x440
  do_fcntl+0x150/0xc18
...

Signed-off-by: Will Shiu <Will.Shiu@...iatek.com>
---
 fs/locks.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
index df8b26a42524..a552bdb6badc 100644
--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -1301,6 +1301,7 @@ static int posix_lock_inode(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *request,
  out:
 	spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
 	percpu_up_read(&file_rwsem);
+	trace_posix_lock_inode(inode, request, error);
 	/*
 	 * Free any unused locks.
 	 */
@@ -1309,7 +1310,6 @@ static int posix_lock_inode(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *request,
 	if (new_fl2)
 		locks_free_lock(new_fl2);
 	locks_dispose_list(&dispose);
-	trace_posix_lock_inode(inode, request, error);

 	return error;
 }
-- 
2.18.0