[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vf6FTgHyimX+B80tZEwJRg7ut1=DS=Dbdy+Aa+xVwh5YQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 09:32:58 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Ying Liu <victor.liu@....com>
Cc: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"lee@...nel.org" <lee@...nel.org>,
"jingoohan1@...il.com" <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
"deller@....de" <deller@....de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] backlight: gpio_backlight: Drop output gpio direction
check for initial power state
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 8:17 AM Ying Liu <victor.liu@....com> wrote:
> On Thursday, July 20, 2023 7:28 PM Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 06:06:27AM +0000, Ying Liu wrote:
> > > Bootloader may leave gpio direction as input and gpio value as logical low.
> > > It hints that initial backlight power state should be
> > FB_BLANK_POWERDOWN
> > > since the gpio value is literally logical low.
> >
> > To be honest this probably "hints" that the bootloader simply didn't
> > consider the backlight at all :-) . I'd rather the patch description
> > focus on what circumstances lead to the current code making a bad
> > decision. More like:
> >
> > If the GPIO pin is in the input state but the backlight is currently
> > off due to default pull downs then ...
>
> How about this patch description?
>
> ---------------------------------8<-------------------------------------------
> Without this patch, if gpio pin is in input state but backlight is currently
s/Without this patch, if/If/
> off due to default pull downs, then initial power state is set to
> FB_BLANK_UNBLANK in DT boot mode with phandle link and the backlight is
> effectively turned on in gpio_backlight_probe(), which is undesirable
> according to patch description of commit ec665b756e6f ("backlight:
> gpio-backlight: Correct initial power state handling").
>
> Quote:
> ---
> If in DT boot we have phandle link then leave the GPIO in a state which the
> bootloader left it and let the user of the backlight to configure it further.
> ---
>
> So, let's drop output gpio direction check and only check gpio value to set
> the initial power state.
> ---------------------------------8<-------------------------------------------
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists