linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/microcode/AMD: Increase microcode PATCH_MAX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230721073830.GAZLo19vwzyEWESHum@fat_crate.local>
Date:   Fri, 21 Jul 2023 09:38:30 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Cc:     John Allen <john.allen@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
        x86@...nel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/microcode/AMD: Increase microcode PATCH_MAX_SIZE

On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 06:47:39AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> is now 32M instead of 12M. That is a complete waste on my _one_ node system.
> Can we make amd_ucode_patch dynamic first, depending on num_online_nodes()?

I have a small set which gets rid of all those arrays - I just need to
finish it.

:-(

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette