linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v1] platform/x86: wmi: Do not register driver with invalid GUID

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZLpNIsLrrQGWOQc/@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Jul 2023 12:17:22 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Barnabás Pőcze <pobrn@...tonmail.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1] platform/x86: wmi: Do not register driver with
 invalid GUID

On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 10:42:29AM +0000, Barnabás Pőcze wrote:
> 2023. július 20., csütörtök 10:36 keltezéssel, Andy Shevchenko írta:
> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 07:23:37PM +0000, Barnabás Pőcze wrote:

...

> > Yes, that's what file2alias is for. We trust modules we build, right?
> > If you don't trust, then we have much bigger problem than this patch
> > tries to address.

> It seems we have to agree to disagree then.

I am confused. The parts are related to each other, you can't disagree on both.

You mean we have much bigger problem in the kernel or file2alias is the proper
place? I.o.w. which part you agree with and respectively disagree?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko