[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e2c15ec828daf2c1d4277e78859698929efe86b0@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 01:56:28 +0000
From: "Yajun Deng" <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>
To: "Petr Tesařík" <petr@...arici.cz>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@....de>
Cc: corbet@....net, m.szyprowski@...sung.com, robin.murphy@....com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, paulmck@...nel.org,
catalin.marinas@....com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, kim.phillips@....com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dma-contiguous: support numa CMA for specified node
July 20, 2023 at 8:27 PM, "Petr Tesařík" <petr@...arici.cz> wrote:
>
> V Thu, 20 Jul 2023 13:54:08 +0200
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> napsáno:
>
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 08:47:37AM +0000, Yajun Deng wrote:
> > It's based on linux-next tree.
> >
> > This patch should be after my other patch in linux-next tree.
> > a960925a6b23("dma-contiguous: support per-numa CMA for all architectures").
> >
> > Where did this land?
> >
>
> Well... in the linux-next tree:
>
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/linux-next.html
>
> >
> > dma patches really should be going through the DMA tree..
> >
>
> Indeed. The other patch was also sent to the iommu ML back in May. It's
> the thread where we were looking for Barry Song's current email address.
>
Thanks. This link shows what happened at that time:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230512094210.141540-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev/T/#u
> Petr T
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists