[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bd976e78-953c-68cb-291f-7ad2188aa3fb@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 22:13:48 -0400
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@...e.cz>,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Brent Rowsell <browsell@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
yu.c.chen@...el.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Peter Hunt <pehunt@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
ltp@...ts.linux.it, lkp@...el.com
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] sched/core: Use empty mask to reset cpumasks in
sched_setaffinity()
On 7/17/23 10:41, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
>> Running tests.......
>> <<<test_start>>>
>> tag=sched_setaffinity01 stime=1689382567
>> cmdline="sched_setaffinity01"
>> contacts=""
>> analysis=exit
>> <<<test_output>>>
>> tst_test.c:1558: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 02m 30s
>> sched_setaffinity01.c:83: TPASS: sched_setaffinity() failed: EFAULT (14)
>> sched_setaffinity01.c:73: TFAIL: sched_setaffinity() succeded unexpectedly
>> tst_test.c:1612: TINFO: If you are running on slow machine, try exporting LTP_TIMEOUT_MUL > 1
>> tst_test.c:1614: TBROK: Test killed! (timeout?)
> So what the test does is that it sets empty affinity mask to
> sched_setaffinity() and expects EINVAL. Instead it looks like the call
> now succeeeds, the test stops getting schedulled and is killed by
> timeout.
>
I had sent out a v2 patch should not fail the LTP's sched_setaffinity()
test.
Cheers,
Longman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists