[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230721120046.2262291-1-iii@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 13:57:53 +0200
From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jens Freimann <jfreimann@...hat.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix stepping into interrupt handlers
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230629083452.183274-1-iii@linux.ibm.com/
v1 -> v2: Fix three more issues.
Add selftests (Claudio).
Hi,
I tried to compare the behavior of KVM and TCG by diffing instruction
traces, and found five issues in KVM related to stepping into interrupt
handlers.
I'm not very familiar with the KVM code base, so please let me know if
the fixes can be improved or if these problems need to be handled
completely differently.
Best regards,
Ilya
Ilya Leoshkevich (6):
KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping into interrupt handlers
KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping into program interrupt
handlers
KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping kernel-emulated instructions
KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping userspace-emulated
instructions
KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping ISKE
KVM: s390: selftests: Add selftest for single-stepping
arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c | 39 ++++-
arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 10 ++
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 20 ++-
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 1 +
.../testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/debug_test.c | 160 ++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 218 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/debug_test.c
--
2.41.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists