[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZLqTe9XroSlOs+39@corigine.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 15:17:31 +0100
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: Lin Ma <linma@....edu.cn>
Cc: steffen.klassert@...unet.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] xfrm: add NULL check in xfrm_update_ae_params
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 09:44:11AM +0800, Lin Ma wrote:
> Normally, x->replay_esn and x->preplay_esn should be allocated at
> xfrm_alloc_replay_state_esn(...) in xfrm_state_construct(..), hence the
> frm_update_ae_params(...) is okay to update them. However, the current
> impelementation of xfrm_new_ae(...) allows a malicious user to directly
nit: impelementation -> implementation
...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists