linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Loongson64: Fix more _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 22 Jul 2023 12:46:18 +0800
From:   "Jiaxun Yang" <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
To:     Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@...aro.org>,
        "linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Huacai Chen" <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
        "kernel test robot" <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Loongson64: Fix more __iomem attributes



在2023年7月19日七月 下午7:39，Philippe Mathieu-Daudé写道：
> On 18/7/23 15:44, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
>> There are some __iomem type casting being missed in previous patch.
>> Fix them here.
>> 
>> Fixes: 5bd3990723bd ("MIPS: Loongson64: Prefix ipi register address pointers with __iomem")
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307020639.QCZOKp8B-lkp@intel.com/
>> Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/mips/loongson64/smp.c | 168 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>>   1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-)
>
>
>>   static void ipi_mailbox_buf_init(void)
>>   {
>> -	ipi_mailbox_buf[0] = (void *)
>> +	ipi_mailbox_buf[0] = (void __iomem *)
>>   		(SMP_CORE_GROUP0_BASE + SMP_CORE0_OFFSET + BUF);
>> -	ipi_mailbox_buf[1] = (void *)
>> +	ipi_mailbox_buf[1] = (void __iomem *)
>>   		(SMP_CORE_GROUP0_BASE + SMP_CORE1_OFFSET + BUF);
>> -	ipi_mailbox_buf[2] = (void *)
>> +	ipi_mailbox_buf[2] = (void __iomem *)
>>   		(SMP_CORE_GROUP0_BASE + SMP_CORE2_OFFSET + BUF);
>> -	ipi_mailbox_buf[3] = (void *)
>> +	ipi_mailbox_buf[3] = (void __iomem *)
>>   		(SMP_CORE_GROUP0_BASE + SMP_CORE3_OFFSET + BUF);
>> -	ipi_mailbox_buf[4] = (void *)
>> +	ipi_mailbox_buf[4] = (void __iomem *)
>>   		(SMP_CORE_GROUP1_BASE + SMP_CORE0_OFFSET + BUF);
>> -	ipi_mailbox_buf[5] = (void *)
>> +	ipi_mailbox_buf[5] = (void __iomem *)
>>   		(SMP_CORE_GROUP1_BASE + SMP_CORE1_OFFSET + BUF);
>> -	ipi_mailbox_buf[6] = (void *)
>> +	ipi_mailbox_buf[6] = (void __iomem *)
>>   		(SMP_CORE_GROUP1_BASE + SMP_CORE2_OFFSET + BUF);
>> -	ipi_mailbox_buf[7] = (void *)
>> +	ipi_mailbox_buf[7] = (void __iomem *)
>>   		(SMP_CORE_GROUP1_BASE + SMP_CORE3_OFFSET + BUF);
>> -	ipi_mailbox_buf[8] = (void *)
>> +	ipi_mailbox_buf[8] = (void __iomem *)
>>   		(SMP_CORE_GROUP2_BASE + SMP_CORE0_OFFSET + BUF);
>> -	ipi_mailbox_buf[9] = (void *)
>> +	ipi_mailbox_buf[9] = (void __iomem *)
>>   		(SMP_CORE_GROUP2_BASE + SMP_CORE1_OFFSET + BUF);
>> -	ipi_mailbox_buf[10] = (void *)
>> +	ipi_mailbox_buf[10] = (void __iomem *)
>>   		(SMP_CORE_GROUP2_BASE + SMP_CORE2_OFFSET + BUF);
>> -	ipi_mailbox_buf[11] = (void *)
>> +	ipi_mailbox_buf[11] = (void __iomem *)
>>   		(SMP_CORE_GROUP2_BASE + SMP_CORE3_OFFSET + BUF);
>> -	ipi_mailbox_buf[12] = (void *)
>> +	ipi_mailbox_buf[12] = (void __iomem *)
>>   		(SMP_CORE_GROUP3_BASE + SMP_CORE0_OFFSET + BUF);
>> -	ipi_mailbox_buf[13] = (void *)
>> +	ipi_mailbox_buf[13] = (void __iomem *)
>>   		(SMP_CORE_GROUP3_BASE + SMP_CORE1_OFFSET + BUF);
>> -	ipi_mailbox_buf[14] = (void *)
>> +	ipi_mailbox_buf[14] = (void __iomem *)
>>   		(SMP_CORE_GROUP3_BASE + SMP_CORE2_OFFSET + BUF);
>> -	ipi_mailbox_buf[15] = (void *)
>> +	ipi_mailbox_buf[15] = (void __iomem *)
>>   		(SMP_CORE_GROUP3_BASE + SMP_CORE3_OFFSET + BUF);
>>   }
>
> OK up to here,
>
>> @@ -782,7 +782,7 @@ void play_dead(void)
>>   
>>   	if (prid_imp == PRID_IMP_LOONGSON_64G) {
>>   		play_dead_at_ckseg1 =
>> -			(void *)CKSEG1ADDR((unsigned long)loongson3_type3_play_dead);
>> +			(void __iomem *)CKSEG1ADDR((unsigned long)loongson3_type3_play_dead);
>
> but these changes look dubious.

Oops, will fix later.

Thanks

>
>>   		goto out;
>>   	}
>>   
>> @@ -790,19 +790,19 @@ void play_dead(void)
>>   	case PRID_REV_LOONGSON3A_R1:
>>   	default:
>>   		play_dead_at_ckseg1 =
>> -			(void *)CKSEG1ADDR((unsigned long)loongson3_type1_play_dead);
>> +			(void __iomem *)CKSEG1ADDR((unsigned long)loongson3_type1_play_dead);
>>   		break;
>>   	case PRID_REV_LOONGSON3B_R1:
>>   	case PRID_REV_LOONGSON3B_R2:
>>   		play_dead_at_ckseg1 =
>> -			(void *)CKSEG1ADDR((unsigned long)loongson3_type2_play_dead);
>> +			(void __iomem *)CKSEG1ADDR((unsigned long)loongson3_type2_play_dead);
>>   		break;
>>   	case PRID_REV_LOONGSON3A_R2_0:
>>   	case PRID_REV_LOONGSON3A_R2_1:
>>   	case PRID_REV_LOONGSON3A_R3_0:
>>   	case PRID_REV_LOONGSON3A_R3_1:
>>   		play_dead_at_ckseg1 =
>> -			(void *)CKSEG1ADDR((unsigned long)loongson3_type3_play_dead);
>> +			(void __iomem *)CKSEG1ADDR((unsigned long)loongson3_type3_play_dead);
>>   		break;
>>   	}
>>

-- 
- Jiaxun