linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] erofs: boost negative xattr lookup with bloom filter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZLuJcKH3ymLEVQec@debian>
Date:   Sat, 22 Jul 2023 15:46:56 +0800
From:   Gao Xiang <xiang@...nel.org>
To:     Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] erofs: boost negative xattr lookup with bloom
 filter

On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 03:33:11PM +0800, Jingbo Xu wrote:

...

> >> +	uint32_t hashbit;
> > 
> > Why using `uint32_t` here rather than `unsigned int`? We don't use
> > `uint32_t` in the kernel codebase.
> > 
> 
> xxh32() returns uint32_t.

we never use (u)intxx_t in the native kernel code.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang