linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] riscv: enable HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFP8O3+41QFVyNTVJ2iZYkB0tqnvdLTAoGShgGy-qPP1PHjBEw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Jul 2023 17:37:31 -0700
From:   Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
Cc:     Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, jszhang@...nel.org,
        ndesaulniers@...gle.com, bjorn@...nel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        aou@...s.berkeley.edu, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] riscv: enable HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION

On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 1:06 PM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 25 Jun 2023 05:43:13 PDT (-0700), Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 08:24:56PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 10:17:54AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 11:18:03PM +0000, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> >> > > If you wanted to restrict it to just LD_IS_BFD in arch/riscv/Kconfig,
> >> > > that would be fine with me too.
> >> > >
> >> > >   select HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION if LD_IS_BFD
> >> >
> >> > Hi Jisheng, would you mind sending a v3 with the attached patch applied
> >> > on top / at the end of your series?
> >>
> >> Hi Nick, Nathan, Palmer,
> >>
> >> I saw the series has been applied to riscv-next, so I'm not sure which
> >> solution would it be, Palmer to apply Nick's patch to riscv-next or
> >> I to send out v3, any suggestion is appreciated.
> >
> > I don't see what you are seeing w/ riscv/for-next. HEAD is currently at
> > 4681dacadeef ("riscv: replace deprecated scall with ecall") and there
> > are no patches from your series in the branch:
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux.git/log/?h=for-next
>
> It's been in and out of staging a few times as we tracked down the
> performance regression, but it shouldn't have ever made it to linux-next
> for real.
>
> I'm fine just picking up the patch to disable DCE, I've got a few other
> (hopefully small) things to work through first though.

Note: for GCC, -fpatchable-function-entry= (used by
arch/riscv/Kconfig) require GCC 13 for correct garbage collection
semantics.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110729

> > Cheers,
> > Conor.
> >
> >> > > Nick said he would work on a report for the LLVM side, so as long as
> >> > > this issue is handled in some way to avoid regressing LLD builds until
> >> > > it is resolved, I don't think there is anything else for the kernel to
> >> > > do. We like to have breadcrumbs via issue links, not sure if the report
> >> > > will be internal to Google or on LLVM's issue tracker though;
> >> > > regardless, we will have to touch this block to add a version check
> >> > > later, at which point we can add a link to the fix in LLD.
> >> >
> >> > https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1881
> >>
> >> > From 3e5e010958ee41b9fb408cfade8fb017c2fe7169 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >> > From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
> >> > Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 10:06:17 -0700
> >> > Subject: [PATCH] riscv: disable HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION for LLD
> >> >
> >> > Linking allyesconfig with ld.lld-17 with CONFIG_DEAD_CODE_ELIMINATION=y
> >> > takes hours.  Assuming this is a performance regression that can be
> >> > fixed, tentatively disable this for now so that allyesconfig builds
> >> > don't start timing out.  If and when there's a fix to ld.lld, this can
> >> > be converted to a version check instead so that users of older but still
> >> > supported versions of ld.lld don't hurt themselves by enabling
> >> > CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION=y.
> >> >
> >> > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1881
> >> > Reported-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
> >> > Suggested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
> >> > ---
> >> > Hi Jisheng, would you mind sending a v3 with this patch on top/at the
> >> > end of your patch series?
> >> >
> >> >  arch/riscv/Kconfig | 3 ++-
> >> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> >> > index 8effe5bb7788..0573991e9b78 100644
> >> > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> >> > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> >> > @@ -116,7 +116,8 @@ config RISCV
> >> >    select HAVE_KPROBES if !XIP_KERNEL
> >> >    select HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE if !XIP_KERNEL
> >> >    select HAVE_KRETPROBES if !XIP_KERNEL
> >> > -  select HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION
> >> > +  # https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1881
> >> > +  select HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION if !LD_IS_LLD
> >> >    select HAVE_MOVE_PMD
> >> >    select HAVE_MOVE_PUD
> >> >    select HAVE_PCI
> >> > --
> >> > 2.41.0.162.gfafddb0af9-goog
> >> >
> >>
>


-- 
宋方睿