| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 17:52:27 -0700
From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: isaku.yamahata@...el.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, isaku.yamahata@...il.com,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, erdemaktas@...gle.com,
Sagi Shahar <sagis@...gle.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.wang.linux@...il.com>, chen.bo@...el.com,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>,
Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@...gle.com>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
Yuan Yao <yuan.yao@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 04/10] KVM: x86: Introduce PFERR_GUEST_ENC_MASK to
indicate fault is private
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 07:11:43AM -0700,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> wrote:
> s/Introduce/Use
>
> This doesn't "introduce" anything, in the sense that it's an AMD-defined error
> code flag. That matters because KVM *did* introduce/define PFERR_IMPLICIT_ACCESS.
>
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023, isaku.yamahata@...el.com wrote:
> > From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
> >
> > Add two PFERR codes to designate that the page fault is private and that
> > it requires looking up memory attributes. The vendor kvm page fault
> > handler should set PFERR_GUEST_ENC_MASK bit based on their fault
> > information. It may or may not use the hardware value directly or
> > parse the hardware value to set the bit.
> >
> > For KVM_X86_PROTECTED_VM, ask memory attributes for the fault privateness.
>
> ...
>
> > +static inline bool kvm_is_fault_private(struct kvm *kvm, gpa_t gpa, u64 error_code)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * This is racy with mmu_seq. If we hit a race, it would result in a
> > + * spurious KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT.
> > + */
> > + if (kvm->arch.vm_type == KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM)
> > + return kvm_mem_is_private(kvm, gpa_to_gfn(gpa));
>
> Please synthesize the error code flag for SW-protected VMs, same as TDX, e.g.
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index 20e289e872eb..de9e0a9c41e6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -5751,6 +5751,10 @@ int noinline kvm_mmu_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa, u64 err
> if (WARN_ON(!VALID_PAGE(vcpu->arch.mmu->root.hpa)))
> return RET_PF_RETRY;
>
> + if (vcpu->kvm->arch.vm_type == KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM &&
> + kvm_mem_is_private(vcpu->kvm, gpa_to_gfn(cr2_or_gpa)))
> + error_code |= PFERR_GUEST_ENC_MASK;
> +
> r = RET_PF_INVALID;
> if (unlikely(error_code & PFERR_RSVD_MASK)) {
> r = handle_mmio_page_fault(vcpu, cr2_or_gpa, direct);
>
> Functionally it's the same, but I want all VM types to have the same source of
> truth for private versus shared, and I really don't want kvm_is_fault_private()
> to exist.
Here is the updated patch.
>From 30c452cd6a94b485eaa5f92dee4c222dd30ebcbe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: <30c452cd6a94b485eaa5f92dee4c222dd30ebcbe.1689987085.git.isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
In-Reply-To: <ab9d8654bd98ae24de05788a2ecaa4bea6c0c44b.1689987085.git.isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
References: <ab9d8654bd98ae24de05788a2ecaa4bea6c0c44b.1689987085.git.isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 12:34:00 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 4/8] KVM: x86: Use PFERR_GUEST_ENC_MASK to indicate fault is
private
SEV-SNP defines PFERR_GUEST_ENC_MASK (bit 32) in page-fault error bits to
represent the guest page is encrypted. Use the bit to designate that the
page fault is private and that it requires looking up memory attributes.
The vendor kvm page fault handler should set PFERR_GUEST_ENC_MASK bit based
on their fault information. It may or may not use the hardware value
directly or parse the hardware value to set the bit.
For KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM, ask memory attributes for the fault
privateness. For async page fault, carry the bit and use it for kvm page
fault handler.
Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
---
Changes v4 -> v5:
- Eliminate kvm_is_fault_private() by open code the function
- Make async page fault handler to carry is_private bit
Changes v3 -> v4:
- rename back struct kvm_page_fault::private => is_private
- catch up rename: KVM_X86_PROTECTED_VM => KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM
Changes v2 -> v3:
- Revive PFERR_GUEST_ENC_MASK
- rename struct kvm_page_fault::is_private => private
- Add check KVM_X86_PROTECTED_VM
Changes v1 -> v2:
- Introduced fault type and replaced is_private with fault_type.
- Add kvm_get_fault_type() to encapsulate the difference.
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 +++
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 2c9350aa0da4..a1ae3d881063 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -255,6 +255,7 @@ enum x86_intercept_stage;
#define PFERR_SGX_BIT 15
#define PFERR_GUEST_FINAL_BIT 32
#define PFERR_GUEST_PAGE_BIT 33
+#define PFERR_GUEST_ENC_BIT 34
#define PFERR_IMPLICIT_ACCESS_BIT 48
#define PFERR_PRESENT_MASK BIT(PFERR_PRESENT_BIT)
@@ -266,6 +267,7 @@ enum x86_intercept_stage;
#define PFERR_SGX_MASK BIT(PFERR_SGX_BIT)
#define PFERR_GUEST_FINAL_MASK BIT_ULL(PFERR_GUEST_FINAL_BIT)
#define PFERR_GUEST_PAGE_MASK BIT_ULL(PFERR_GUEST_PAGE_BIT)
+#define PFERR_GUEST_ENC_MASK BIT_ULL(PFERR_GUEST_ENC_BIT)
#define PFERR_IMPLICIT_ACCESS BIT_ULL(PFERR_IMPLICIT_ACCESS_BIT)
#define PFERR_NESTED_GUEST_PAGE (PFERR_GUEST_PAGE_MASK | \
@@ -1770,6 +1772,7 @@ struct kvm_arch_async_pf {
gfn_t gfn;
unsigned long cr3;
bool direct_map;
+ u64 error_code;
};
extern u32 __read_mostly kvm_nr_uret_msrs;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index a2fe091e327a..01e74af48e4c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -4285,18 +4285,19 @@ static u32 alloc_apf_token(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return (vcpu->arch.apf.id++ << 12) | vcpu->vcpu_id;
}
-static bool kvm_arch_setup_async_pf(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa,
- gfn_t gfn)
+static bool kvm_arch_setup_async_pf(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
{
struct kvm_arch_async_pf arch;
arch.token = alloc_apf_token(vcpu);
- arch.gfn = gfn;
+ arch.gfn = fault->gfn;
arch.direct_map = vcpu->arch.mmu->root_role.direct;
arch.cr3 = kvm_mmu_get_guest_pgd(vcpu, vcpu->arch.mmu);
+ arch.error_code = fault->error_code & PFERR_GUEST_ENC_MASK;
- return kvm_setup_async_pf(vcpu, cr2_or_gpa,
- kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_hva(vcpu, gfn), &arch);
+ return kvm_setup_async_pf(vcpu, fault->addr,
+ kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_hva(vcpu, fault->gfn), &arch);
}
void kvm_arch_async_page_ready(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_async_pf *work)
@@ -4315,7 +4316,8 @@ void kvm_arch_async_page_ready(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_async_pf *work)
work->arch.cr3 != kvm_mmu_get_guest_pgd(vcpu, vcpu->arch.mmu))
return;
- kvm_mmu_do_page_fault(vcpu, work->cr2_or_gpa, 0, true, NULL);
+ kvm_mmu_do_page_fault(vcpu, work->cr2_or_gpa, work->arch.error_code,
+ true, NULL);
}
static inline u8 kvm_max_level_for_order(int order)
@@ -4399,8 +4401,12 @@ static int __kvm_faultin_pfn(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault
return RET_PF_EMULATE;
}
- if (fault->is_private != kvm_mem_is_private(vcpu->kvm, fault->gfn))
- return kvm_do_memory_fault_exit(vcpu, fault);
+ if (fault->is_private != kvm_mem_is_private(vcpu->kvm, fault->gfn)) {
+ if (vcpu->kvm->arch.vm_type == KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM)
+ return RET_PF_RETRY;
+ else
+ return kvm_do_memory_fault_exit(vcpu, fault);
+ }
if (fault->is_private)
return kvm_faultin_pfn_private(vcpu, fault);
@@ -4418,7 +4424,7 @@ static int __kvm_faultin_pfn(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault
trace_kvm_async_pf_repeated_fault(fault->addr, fault->gfn);
kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_APF_HALT, vcpu);
return RET_PF_RETRY;
- } else if (kvm_arch_setup_async_pf(vcpu, fault->addr, fault->gfn)) {
+ } else if (kvm_arch_setup_async_pf(vcpu, fault)) {
return RET_PF_RETRY;
}
}
@@ -5836,6 +5842,14 @@ int noinline kvm_mmu_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa, u64 err
if (WARN_ON(!VALID_PAGE(vcpu->arch.mmu->root.hpa)))
return RET_PF_RETRY;
+ /*
+ * This is racy with updating memory attributes with mmu_seq. If we
+ * hit a race, it would result in retrying page fault.
+ */
+ if (vcpu->kvm->arch.vm_type == KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM &&
+ kvm_mem_is_private(vcpu->kvm, gpa_to_gfn(cr2_or_gpa)))
+ error_code |= PFERR_GUEST_ENC_MASK;
+
r = RET_PF_INVALID;
if (unlikely(error_code & PFERR_RSVD_MASK)) {
r = handle_mmio_page_fault(vcpu, cr2_or_gpa, direct);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
index 7f9ec1e5b136..3a423403af01 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
@@ -295,13 +295,13 @@ static inline int kvm_mmu_do_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa,
.user = err & PFERR_USER_MASK,
.prefetch = prefetch,
.is_tdp = likely(vcpu->arch.mmu->page_fault == kvm_tdp_page_fault),
+ .is_private = err & PFERR_GUEST_ENC_MASK,
.nx_huge_page_workaround_enabled =
is_nx_huge_page_enabled(vcpu->kvm),
.max_level = KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL,
.req_level = PG_LEVEL_4K,
.goal_level = PG_LEVEL_4K,
- .is_private = kvm_mem_is_private(vcpu->kvm, cr2_or_gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT),
};
int r;
--
2.25.1
--
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists