linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 21/22] i2c: virtio: Remove #ifdef guards for PM related functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 22 Jul 2023 23:07:18 +0800
From:   kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To:     Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa-dev@...g-engineering.com>
Cc:     llvm@...ts.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Conghui Chen <conghui.chen@...el.com>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 21/22] i2c: virtio: Remove #ifdef guards for PM
 related functions

Hi Paul,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on wsa/i2c/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on brgl/gpio/for-next krzk/for-next linus/master v6.5-rc2 next-20230721]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Paul-Cercueil/i2c-au1550-Remove-ifdef-guards-for-PM-related-functions/20230722-200209
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git i2c/for-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230722115310.27681-5-paul%40crapouillou.net
patch subject: [PATCH v2 21/22] i2c: virtio: Remove #ifdef guards for PM related functions
config: i386-randconfig-r015-20230722 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230722/202307222246.K1GYOGCB-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 15.0.7 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 8dfdcc7b7bf66834a761bd8de445840ef68e4d1a)
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230722/202307222246.K1GYOGCB-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307222246.K1GYOGCB-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c:270:3: error: field designator 'freeze' does not refer to any field in type 'struct virtio_driver'
           .freeze                 = pm_sleep_ptr(virtio_i2c_freeze),
            ^
>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c:271:3: error: field designator 'restore' does not refer to any field in type 'struct virtio_driver'
           .restore                = pm_sleep_ptr(virtio_i2c_restore),
            ^
   2 errors generated.


vim +270 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c

   260	
   261	static struct virtio_driver virtio_i2c_driver = {
   262		.feature_table		= features,
   263		.feature_table_size	= ARRAY_SIZE(features),
   264		.id_table		= id_table,
   265		.probe			= virtio_i2c_probe,
   266		.remove			= virtio_i2c_remove,
   267		.driver			= {
   268			.name	= "i2c_virtio",
   269		},
 > 270		.freeze			= pm_sleep_ptr(virtio_i2c_freeze),
 > 271		.restore		= pm_sleep_ptr(virtio_i2c_restore),
   272	};
   273	module_virtio_driver(virtio_i2c_driver);
   274	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki