[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZLw4CnzLI/QHPGWx@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2023 21:11:54 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Icenowy Zheng <zhengxingda@...as.ac.cn>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, Icenowy Zheng <uwu@...nowy.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND RESEND] thermal/of: support thermal zones w/o
trips subnode
On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 08:25:34PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> From: Icenowy Zheng <uwu@...nowy.me>
>
> Although the current device tree binding of thermal zones require the
> trips subnode, the binding in kernel v5.15 does not require it, and many
> device trees shipped with the kernel, for example,
> allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi and mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi in ARM64, still
> comply to the old binding and contain no trips subnode.
>
> Allow the code to successfully register thermal zones w/o trips subnode
> for DT binding compatibility now.
>
> Furtherly, the inconsistency between DTs and bindings should be resolved
> by either adding empty trips subnode or dropping the trips subnode
> requirement.
This makes sense to me - it allows people to see the reported
temperature even if there's no trips defined which seems more
helpful than refusing to register.
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists