[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12251678.O9o76ZdvQC@natalenko.name>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2023 11:39:42 +0200
From: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
To: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andres Freund <andres@...razel.de>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.4 800/800] io_uring: Use io_schedule* in cqring wait
Hello.
On neděle 16. července 2023 21:50:53 CEST Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> From: Andres Freund <andres@...razel.de>
>
> commit 8a796565cec3601071cbbd27d6304e202019d014 upstream.
>
> I observed poor performance of io_uring compared to synchronous IO. That
> turns out to be caused by deeper CPU idle states entered with io_uring,
> due to io_uring using plain schedule(), whereas synchronous IO uses
> io_schedule().
>
> The losses due to this are substantial. On my cascade lake workstation,
> t/io_uring from the fio repository e.g. yields regressions between 20%
> and 40% with the following command:
> ./t/io_uring -r 5 -X0 -d 1 -s 1 -c 1 -p 0 -S$use_sync -R 0 /mnt/t2/fio/write.0.0
>
> This is repeatable with different filesystems, using raw block devices
> and using different block devices.
>
> Use io_schedule_prepare() / io_schedule_finish() in
> io_cqring_wait_schedule() to address the difference.
>
> After that using io_uring is on par or surpassing synchronous IO (using
> registered files etc makes it reliably win, but arguably is a less fair
> comparison).
>
> There are other calls to schedule() in io_uring/, but none immediately
> jump out to be similarly situated, so I did not touch them. Similarly,
> it's possible that mutex_lock_io() should be used, but it's not clear if
> there are cases where that matters.
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 5.10+
> Cc: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
> Cc: io-uring@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Andres Freund <andres@...razel.de>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230707162007.194068-1-andres@anarazel.de
> [axboe: minor style fixup]
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> ---
> io_uring/io_uring.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
> +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
> @@ -2575,6 +2575,8 @@ int io_run_task_work_sig(struct io_ring_
> static inline int io_cqring_wait_schedule(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
> struct io_wait_queue *iowq)
> {
> + int token, ret;
> +
> if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(ctx->check_cq)))
> return 1;
> if (unlikely(!llist_empty(&ctx->work_llist)))
> @@ -2585,11 +2587,20 @@ static inline int io_cqring_wait_schedul
> return -EINTR;
> if (unlikely(io_should_wake(iowq)))
> return 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * Use io_schedule_prepare/finish, so cpufreq can take into account
> + * that the task is waiting for IO - turns out to be important for low
> + * QD IO.
> + */
> + token = io_schedule_prepare();
> + ret = 0;
> if (iowq->timeout == KTIME_MAX)
> schedule();
> else if (!schedule_hrtimeout(&iowq->timeout, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS))
> - return -ETIME;
> - return 0;
> + ret = -ETIME;
> + io_schedule_finish(token);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> /*
Reportedly, this caused a regression as reported in [1] [2] [3]. Not only v6.4.4 is affected, v6.1.39 is affected too.
Reverting this commit fixes the issue.
Please check.
Thanks.
[1] https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=287343
[2] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217700
[3] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217699
--
Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum)
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists