| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230723154105.GB17320@pengutronix.de>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2023 17:41:05 +0200
From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
To: Ziqi Zhao <astrajoan@...oo.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, ivan.orlov0322@...il.com,
kernel@...gutronix.de, kuba@...nel.org, linux@...pel-privat.de,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, mkl@...gutronix.de, pabeni@...hat.com,
robin@...tonic.nl, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
socketcan@...tkopp.net, arnd@...db.de,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mudongliangabcd@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
nikolay@...dia.com, roopa@...dia.com,
syzbot+881d65229ca4f9ae8c84@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
syzbot+1591462f226d9cbf0564@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: j1939: prevent deadlock by changing
j1939_socks_lock to rwlock
Hi,
Thank you for you patch. Right now I'm on vacation, I'll to take a look
on it as soon as possible. If i do not response for more then 3 weeks,
please ping me.
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 09:22:26AM -0700, Ziqi Zhao wrote:
> The following 3 locks would race against each other, causing the
> deadlock situation in the Syzbot bug report:
>
> - j1939_socks_lock
> - active_session_list_lock
> - sk_session_queue_lock
>
> A reasonable fix is to change j1939_socks_lock to an rwlock, since in
> the rare situations where a write lock is required for the linked list
> that j1939_socks_lock is protecting, the code does not attempt to
> acquire any more locks. This would break the circular lock dependency,
> where, for example, the current thread already locks j1939_socks_lock
> and attempts to acquire sk_session_queue_lock, and at the same time,
> another thread attempts to acquire j1939_socks_lock while holding
> sk_session_queue_lock.
>
> NOTE: This patch along does not fix the unregister_netdevice bug
> reported by Syzbot; instead, it solves a deadlock situation to prepare
> for one or more further patches to actually fix the Syzbot bug, which
> appears to be a reference counting problem within the j1939 codebase.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+1591462f226d9cbf0564@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Ziqi Zhao <astrajoan@...oo.com>
> ---
> net/can/j1939/j1939-priv.h | 2 +-
> net/can/j1939/main.c | 2 +-
> net/can/j1939/socket.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/can/j1939/j1939-priv.h b/net/can/j1939/j1939-priv.h
> index 16af1a7f80f6..74f15592d170 100644
> --- a/net/can/j1939/j1939-priv.h
> +++ b/net/can/j1939/j1939-priv.h
> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ struct j1939_priv {
> unsigned int tp_max_packet_size;
>
> /* lock for j1939_socks list */
> - spinlock_t j1939_socks_lock;
> + rwlock_t j1939_socks_lock;
> struct list_head j1939_socks;
>
> struct kref rx_kref;
> diff --git a/net/can/j1939/main.c b/net/can/j1939/main.c
> index ecff1c947d68..a6fb89fa6278 100644
> --- a/net/can/j1939/main.c
> +++ b/net/can/j1939/main.c
> @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ struct j1939_priv *j1939_netdev_start(struct net_device *ndev)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> j1939_tp_init(priv);
> - spin_lock_init(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
> + rwlock_init(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->j1939_socks);
>
> mutex_lock(&j1939_netdev_lock);
> diff --git a/net/can/j1939/socket.c b/net/can/j1939/socket.c
> index feaec4ad6d16..a8b981dc2065 100644
> --- a/net/can/j1939/socket.c
> +++ b/net/can/j1939/socket.c
> @@ -80,16 +80,16 @@ static void j1939_jsk_add(struct j1939_priv *priv, struct j1939_sock *jsk)
> jsk->state |= J1939_SOCK_BOUND;
> j1939_priv_get(priv);
>
> - spin_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
> + write_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
> list_add_tail(&jsk->list, &priv->j1939_socks);
> - spin_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
> + write_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
> }
>
> static void j1939_jsk_del(struct j1939_priv *priv, struct j1939_sock *jsk)
> {
> - spin_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
> + write_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
> list_del_init(&jsk->list);
> - spin_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
> + write_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
>
> j1939_priv_put(priv);
> jsk->state &= ~J1939_SOCK_BOUND;
> @@ -329,13 +329,13 @@ bool j1939_sk_recv_match(struct j1939_priv *priv, struct j1939_sk_buff_cb *skcb)
> struct j1939_sock *jsk;
> bool match = false;
>
> - spin_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
> + read_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
> list_for_each_entry(jsk, &priv->j1939_socks, list) {
> match = j1939_sk_recv_match_one(jsk, skcb);
> if (match)
> break;
> }
> - spin_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
> + read_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
>
> return match;
> }
> @@ -344,11 +344,11 @@ void j1939_sk_recv(struct j1939_priv *priv, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> struct j1939_sock *jsk;
>
> - spin_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
> + read_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
> list_for_each_entry(jsk, &priv->j1939_socks, list) {
> j1939_sk_recv_one(jsk, skb);
> }
> - spin_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
> + read_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
> }
>
> static void j1939_sk_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
> @@ -484,6 +484,7 @@ static int j1939_sk_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int len)
>
> priv = j1939_netdev_start(ndev);
> dev_put(ndev);
> +
> if (IS_ERR(priv)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(priv);
> goto out_release_sock;
> @@ -1078,12 +1079,12 @@ void j1939_sk_errqueue(struct j1939_session *session,
> }
>
> /* spread RX notifications to all sockets subscribed to this session */
> - spin_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
> + read_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
> list_for_each_entry(jsk, &priv->j1939_socks, list) {
> if (j1939_sk_recv_match_one(jsk, &session->skcb))
> __j1939_sk_errqueue(session, &jsk->sk, type);
> }
> - spin_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
> + read_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
> };
>
> void j1939_sk_send_loop_abort(struct sock *sk, int err)
> @@ -1271,7 +1272,7 @@ void j1939_sk_netdev_event_netdown(struct j1939_priv *priv)
> struct j1939_sock *jsk;
> int error_code = ENETDOWN;
>
> - spin_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
> + read_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
> list_for_each_entry(jsk, &priv->j1939_socks, list) {
> jsk->sk.sk_err = error_code;
> if (!sock_flag(&jsk->sk, SOCK_DEAD))
> @@ -1279,7 +1280,7 @@ void j1939_sk_netdev_event_netdown(struct j1939_priv *priv)
>
> j1939_sk_queue_drop_all(priv, jsk, error_code);
> }
> - spin_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
> + read_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
> }
>
> static int j1939_sk_no_ioctlcmd(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists