[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAUT3iPUaNRUyvqP1O97M0AmKri7Ghc06ku4TS6vcHQ=Sb4ycg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2023 19:44:44 +0200
From: Franziska Näpelt
<franziska.naepelt@...glemail.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
Emily Peri <eperi1024@...il.com>,
Guo Zihua <guozihua@...wei.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Kang Minchul <tegongkang@...il.com>,
Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@...il.com>,
Veerendranath Jakkam <quic_vjakkam@...cinc.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix space issues
Hi Markus,
Am So., 23. Juli 2023 um 08:19 Uhr schrieb Markus Elfring
<Markus.Elfring@....de>:
>
> > Am I supposed to adjust something here?
>
> There are possibilities remaining to handle recurring communication difficulties
> in more constructive ways for some hints.
>
>
> > As far as I understood, I can ignore the comments from Markus, correct?
>
> Would the provided technical information be taken better into account
> if it would be presented by any other contributors?
That's not my point, I appreciate feedback from anybody, absolutely no question
on that. I'm just struggling to know what I'm supposed to do when the maintainer
is saying somebody's comments are not helpful.
In another thread I was told I should mainly follow the maintainers comments in
case of different opinions.
Franziska
Powered by blists - more mailing lists