linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] io_uring: Use io

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMEGJJ0oNGBg=9jRogsstcYCBUVnDGpuijwXVZZQEJr=2awaqA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Jul 2023 17:48:36 +0100
From:   Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, andres@...razel.de,
        asml.silence@...il.com, david@...morbit.com, hch@....de,
        io-uring@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: Use io_schedule* in cqring wait

Hi Jens,

On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 at 17:08, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
>
> On 7/24/23 10:07?AM, Phil Elwell wrote:
> >> Even though I don't think this is an actual problem, it is a bit
> >> confusing that you get 100% iowait while waiting without having IO
> >> pending. So I do think the suggested patch is probably worthwhile
> >> pursuing. I'll post it and hopefully have Andres test it too, if he's
> >> available.
> >
> > If you CC me I'll happily test it for you.
>
> Here it is.

< snip >

Thanks, that works for me on top of 6.5-rc3. Going to 6.1 is a
non-trivial (for me) back-port - the switch from "ret = 0" in 6.5 to
"ret = 1" in 6.1 is surprising.

Phil