linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.4 39/40] apparmor: fix use of strcpy in policy_unpack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230724013140.2327815-39-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Sun, 23 Jul 2023 21:31:39 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, james.l.morris@...cle.com,
        serge@...lyn.com, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.4 39/40] apparmor: fix use of strcpy in policy_unpack_test

From: Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>

[ Upstream commit b54aebd4411134b525a82d663a26b2f135ecb7e8 ]

Replace the use of strcpy() in build_aa_ext_struct() in
policy_unpack_test.c with strscpy().

strscpy() is the safer method to use to ensure the buffer does not
overflow. This was found by kernel test robot:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/202301040348.NbfVsXO0-lkp@intel.com/.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>

Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c | 13 ++++++-------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c b/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c
index e1bfdab524b79..5c9bde25e56df 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c
@@ -69,31 +69,30 @@ static struct aa_ext *build_aa_ext_struct(struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf,
 
 	*buf = AA_NAME;
 	*(buf + 1) = strlen(TEST_STRING_NAME) + 1;
-	strcpy(buf + 3, TEST_STRING_NAME);
+	strscpy(buf + 3, TEST_STRING_NAME, e->end - (void *)(buf + 3));
 
 	buf = e->start + TEST_STRING_BUF_OFFSET;
 	*buf = AA_STRING;
 	*(buf + 1) = strlen(TEST_STRING_DATA) + 1;
-	strcpy(buf + 3, TEST_STRING_DATA);
-
+	strscpy(buf + 3, TEST_STRING_DATA, e->end - (void *)(buf + 3));
 	buf = e->start + TEST_NAMED_U32_BUF_OFFSET;
 	*buf = AA_NAME;
 	*(buf + 1) = strlen(TEST_U32_NAME) + 1;
-	strcpy(buf + 3, TEST_U32_NAME);
+	strscpy(buf + 3, TEST_U32_NAME, e->end - (void *)(buf + 3));
 	*(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U32_NAME) + 1) = AA_U32;
 	*((u32 *)(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U32_NAME) + 2)) = TEST_U32_DATA;
 
 	buf = e->start + TEST_NAMED_U64_BUF_OFFSET;
 	*buf = AA_NAME;
 	*(buf + 1) = strlen(TEST_U64_NAME) + 1;
-	strcpy(buf + 3, TEST_U64_NAME);
+	strscpy(buf + 3, TEST_U64_NAME, e->end - (void *)(buf + 3));
 	*(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U64_NAME) + 1) = AA_U64;
 	*((u64 *)(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U64_NAME) + 2)) = TEST_U64_DATA;
 
 	buf = e->start + TEST_NAMED_BLOB_BUF_OFFSET;
 	*buf = AA_NAME;
 	*(buf + 1) = strlen(TEST_BLOB_NAME) + 1;
-	strcpy(buf + 3, TEST_BLOB_NAME);
+	strscpy(buf + 3, TEST_BLOB_NAME, e->end - (void *)(buf + 3));
 	*(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_BLOB_NAME) + 1) = AA_BLOB;
 	*(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_BLOB_NAME) + 2) = TEST_BLOB_DATA_SIZE;
 	memcpy(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_BLOB_NAME) + 6,
@@ -102,7 +101,7 @@ static struct aa_ext *build_aa_ext_struct(struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf,
 	buf = e->start + TEST_NAMED_ARRAY_BUF_OFFSET;
 	*buf = AA_NAME;
 	*(buf + 1) = strlen(TEST_ARRAY_NAME) + 1;
-	strcpy(buf + 3, TEST_ARRAY_NAME);
+	strscpy(buf + 3, TEST_ARRAY_NAME, e->end - (void *)(buf + 3));
 	*(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_ARRAY_NAME) + 1) = AA_ARRAY;
 	*((u16 *)(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_ARRAY_NAME) + 2)) = TEST_ARRAY_SIZE;
 
-- 
2.39.2