[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <225079a8.e02fc.189857aa264.Coremail.linma@zju.edu.cn>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 09:19:14 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
From: "Lin Ma" <linma@....edu.cn>
To: "Victor Nogueira" <victor@...atatu.com>
Cc: jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] net/sched: mqprio: Add length check for
TCA_MQPRIO_{MAX/MIN}_RATE64
Hello Victor,
>
> Shouldn't the check be nla_len(attr) != sizeof(u64)?
> An attribute with a bigger length also seems to be invalid.
>
> You could also separate this check into another if statement,
> so that the error message is clearer in regards to why the attr is
> invalid. Something like:
>
> if (nla_len(attr) != sizeof(u64)) {
> NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR_FMT(extack, attr,
> "Attribute length expected to be %lu",
> sizeof(u64));
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> > NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(extack, attr,
> > "Attribute type expected to be TCA_MQPRIO_MIN_RATE64");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > @@ -307,7 +308,8 @@ static int mqprio_parse_nlattr(struct Qdisc *sch, struct tc_mqprio_qopt *qopt,
> > i = 0;
> > nla_for_each_nested(attr, tb[TCA_MQPRIO_MAX_RATE64],
> > rem) {
> > - if (nla_type(attr) != TCA_MQPRIO_MAX_RATE64) {
> > + if (nla_type(attr) != TCA_MQPRIO_MAX_RATE64 ||
> > + nla_len(attr) < sizeof(u64)) {
>
> Same as the previous comment.
>
> > NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(extack, attr,
> > "Attribute type expected to be TCA_MQPRIO_MAX_RATE64");
> > return -EINVAL;
>
> cheers,
> Victor
Yeah, I use < instead of != for a looser check. I agree with you the "!=" condition and the separation suggestion.
I will prepare the v2 ASAP.
Thanks
Lin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists