[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230724-grunge-flyover-b0720cf28082@wendy>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 07:47:58 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@....com>
CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"clin@...e.com" <clin@...e.com>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"pierre.gondois@....com" <pierre.gondois@....com>,
Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>,
Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>,
Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
Bough Chen <haibo.chen@....com>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Gaurav Jain <gaurav.jain@....com>,
"alexander.stein@...tq-group.com" <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>,
Sahil Malhotra <sahil.malhotra@....com>,
Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
Varun Sethi <V.Sethi@....com>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: add se-fw
binding doc
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 06:37:22AM +0000, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> > On 12/07/2023 20:26, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 05:42:13PM +0530, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> > >> + value, i.e., supported SoC(s) are imx8ulp, imx93.
> > >> +
> > >> +properties:
> > >> + compatible:
> > >> + enum:
> > >> + - fsl,imx-ele
> > >
> > > This looks like a generic compatible, not a specific one, but you use
> > > it on the imx8ulp. I would have expected that you would have something
> > > like "fsl,imx8ulp-ele" for that.
> >
> > Yeah, this one looks generic, so not what we expect.
>
> This change left un-changed in V4. It is "fsl,se-fw", instead of "fsl,imx8ulp-ele".
> I will change in V5.
That's a generic compatible too, so no different to "fsl,imx-ele".
What is the reason for avoiding the SoC-specific "fsl,imx8ulp-ele"?
> > >> + - fsl,imx93-ele
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists