[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230723174207.cfa7ea5e73197399d9521583@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2023 17:42:07 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>, corbet@....net,
m.szyprowski@...sung.com, robin.murphy@....com, paulmck@...nel.org,
catalin.marinas@....com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, kim.phillips@....com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dma-contiguous: support numa CMA for specified node
On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 09:42:09 +0200 Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 09:59:41AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Where did this land? dma patches really should be going through
> > > the DMA tree..
> >
> > It's in mm-unstable with a note "hch" :)
> >
> > I'll drop it.
>
> Ah. And looking at the patch is isn't even pure dma but also has
> a significant mm side. If you're fine with it I'll pick it up in
> the dma-mapping tree in addition to the follow up.
Please do.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists