[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZL4xif/LX6ZhRqtf@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 16:08:41 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] fs/proc/kcore: avoid bounce buffer for ktext data
On 07/24/23 at 08:23am, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >
> > I met this too when I executed below command to trigger a kcore reading.
> > I wanted to do a simple testing during system running and got this.
> >
> > makedumpfile --mem-usage /proc/kcore
> >
> > Later I tried your above objdump testing, it corrupted system too.
> >
>
> What do you mean with "corrupted system too" -- did it not only fail to
> dump the system, but also actually harmed the system?
>From my testing, reading kcore will cause system panic, then reboot. Not
sure if Jiri saw the same phenomenon.
>
> @Lorenzo do you plan on reproduce + fix, or should we consider reverting
> that change?
When tested on a arm64 system, the reproducution is stable. I will have
a look too to see if I have some finding this week.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists