[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a0afb702-0537-89af-2667-92186d6d3649@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 13:10:37 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...il.com>
To: Minjie Du <duminjie@...o.com>, Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>,
"open list:LIBATA PATA DRIVERS" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: opensource.kernel@...o.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ata: pata_arasan_cf: Use dev_err_probe() instead
dev_err() in data_xfer()
On 7/24/23 12:57 PM, Minjie Du wrote:
> It is possible for dma_request_chan() to return EPROBE_DEFER, which means
> acdev->host->dev is not ready yet.
> At this point dev_err() will have no output.
>
> Signed-off-by: Minjie Du <duminjie@...o.com>
> ---
> V1 - V4:
> Fix code format.
I'm not seeing any fixing in v4
> ---
> drivers/ata/pata_arasan_cf.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_arasan_cf.c b/drivers/ata/pata_arasan_cf.c
> index 6ab294322e79..b32d47112c0a 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/pata_arasan_cf.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_arasan_cf.c
> @@ -529,7 +529,8 @@ static void data_xfer(struct work_struct *work)
> /* dma_request_channel may sleep, so calling from process context */
> acdev->dma_chan = dma_request_chan(acdev->host->dev, "data");
> if (IS_ERR(acdev->dma_chan)) {
> - dev_err(acdev->host->dev, "Unable to get dma_chan\n");
> + dev_err_probe(acdev->host->dev, PTR_ERR(acdev->dma_chan),
"Unable to get dma_chan\n");
> acdev->dma_chan = NULL;
> goto chan_request_fail;
> }
That's how the dev_err_probe() continuation line shouuld be
formatted...
MBR, Sergey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists