linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: use refcount to prevent corruption

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 24 Jul 2023 13:51:18 +0200
From:   Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To:     "Usyskin, Alexander" <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>
Cc:     Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        "linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
        "Lubart, Vitaly" <vitaly.lubart@...el.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
        "linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: use refcount to prevent corruption

Hi Alexander,

alexander.usyskin@...el.com wrote on Mon, 24 Jul 2023 11:43:59 +0000:

> > > > > With this patch applied, when I load up the module, I get the same 3
> > > > > devices:
> > > > > /dev/mtd0
> > > > > /dev/mtd0ro
> > > > > /dev/mtdblock0
> > > > >
> > > > > Upon removal, the below 2 devices still hang around:
> > > > > /dev/mtd0
> > > > > /dev/mtd0ro  
> > > >  
> > > Our use-case do not produce mtdblock, maybe there are some imbalances  
> > of get/put?  
> > > I have somewhere version with pr_debug after every kref_get/put. That may  
> > help to catch where  
> > > it missed, I hope.  
> > 
> > I believe mtdblock is the good citizen here. Just disable
> > CONFIG_MTD_BLOCK from your configuration and you will likely observe
> > the same issue, just a bit narrowed, perhaps. Indeed, if you manage to
> > follow all the get/put calls it can help to find an imbalance.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Miquèl  
> 
> Miquel, do you have CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTER set in your config?

Not sure I get your question. You can enable or disable it, it should
work in both cases (yet, the handling is of course a bit different as
the top level device will be retained/not retained).

Thanks,
Miquèl