| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230725093552-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 09:36:27 -0400
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...rdevices.ru, oxffffaa@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] vsock/virtio: MSG_ZEROCOPY flag support
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 04:28:14PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>
>
> On 25.07.2023 16:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 04:04:13PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 25.07.2023 14:50, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 08:09:03AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 21.07.2023 00:42, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
> >>>>> This adds handling of MSG_ZEROCOPY flag on transmission path: if this
> >>>>> flag is set and zerocopy transmission is possible (enabled in socket
> >>>>> options and transport allows zerocopy), then non-linear skb will be
> >>>>> created and filled with the pages of user's buffer. Pages of user's
> >>>>> buffer are locked in memory by 'get_user_pages()'. Second thing that
> >>>>> this patch does is replace type of skb owning: instead of calling
> >>>>> 'skb_set_owner_sk_safe()' it calls 'skb_set_owner_w()'. Reason of this
> >>>>> change is that '__zerocopy_sg_from_iter()' increments 'sk_wmem_alloc'
> >>>>> of socket, so to decrease this field correctly proper skb destructor is
> >>>>> needed: 'sock_wfree()'. This destructor is set by 'skb_set_owner_w()'.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> Changelog:
> >>>>> v5(big patchset) -> v1:
> >>>>> * Refactorings of 'if' conditions.
> >>>>> * Remove extra blank line.
> >>>>> * Remove 'frag_off' field unneeded init.
> >>>>> * Add function 'virtio_transport_fill_skb()' which fills both linear
> >>>>> and non-linear skb with provided data.
> >>>>> v1 -> v2:
> >>>>> * Use original order of last four arguments in 'virtio_transport_alloc_skb()'.
> >>>>> v2 -> v3:
> >>>>> * Add new transport callback: 'msgzerocopy_check_iov'. It checks that
> >>>>> provided 'iov_iter' with data could be sent in a zerocopy mode.
> >>>>> If this callback is not set in transport - transport allows to send
> >>>>> any 'iov_iter' in zerocopy mode. Otherwise - if callback returns 'true'
> >>>>> then zerocopy is allowed. Reason of this callback is that in case of
> >>>>> G2H transmission we insert whole skb to the tx virtio queue and such
> >>>>> skb must fit to the size of the virtio queue to be sent in a single
> >>>>> iteration (may be tx logic in 'virtio_transport.c' could be reworked
> >>>>> as in vhost to support partial send of current skb). This callback
> >>>>> will be enabled only for G2H path. For details pls see comment
> >>>>> 'Check that tx queue...' below.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> include/net/af_vsock.h | 3 +
> >>>>> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 39 ++++
> >>>>> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 257 ++++++++++++++++++------
> >>>>> 3 files changed, 241 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/include/net/af_vsock.h b/include/net/af_vsock.h
> >>>>> index 0e7504a42925..a6b346eeeb8e 100644
> >>>>> --- a/include/net/af_vsock.h
> >>>>> +++ b/include/net/af_vsock.h
> >>>>> @@ -177,6 +177,9 @@ struct vsock_transport {
> >>>>>
> >>>>> /* Read a single skb */
> >>>>> int (*read_skb)(struct vsock_sock *, skb_read_actor_t);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + /* Zero-copy. */
> >>>>> + bool (*msgzerocopy_check_iov)(const struct iov_iter *);
> >>>>> };
> >>>>>
> >>>>> /**** CORE ****/
> >>>>> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> >>>>> index 7bbcc8093e51..23cb8ed638c4 100644
> >>>>> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> >>>>> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> >>>>> @@ -442,6 +442,43 @@ static void virtio_vsock_rx_done(struct virtqueue *vq)
> >>>>> queue_work(virtio_vsock_workqueue, &vsock->rx_work);
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +static bool virtio_transport_msgzerocopy_check_iov(const struct iov_iter *iov)
> >>>>> +{
> >>>>> + struct virtio_vsock *vsock;
> >>>>> + bool res = false;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + rcu_read_lock();
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + vsock = rcu_dereference(the_virtio_vsock);
> >>>>> + if (vsock) {
> >>>>> + struct virtqueue *vq;
> >>>>> + int iov_pages;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + vq = vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_TX];
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + iov_pages = round_up(iov->count, PAGE_SIZE) / PAGE_SIZE;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + /* Check that tx queue is large enough to keep whole
> >>>>> + * data to send. This is needed, because when there is
> >>>>> + * not enough free space in the queue, current skb to
> >>>>> + * send will be reinserted to the head of tx list of
> >>>>> + * the socket to retry transmission later, so if skb
> >>>>> + * is bigger than whole queue, it will be reinserted
> >>>>> + * again and again, thus blocking other skbs to be sent.
> >>>>> + * Each page of the user provided buffer will be added
> >>>>> + * as a single buffer to the tx virtqueue, so compare
> >>>>> + * number of pages against maximum capacity of the queue.
> >>>>> + * +1 means buffer for the packet header.
> >>>>> + */
> >>>>> + if (iov_pages + 1 <= vq->num_max)
> >>>>
> >>>> I think this check is actual only for case one we don't have indirect buffer feature.
> >>>> With indirect mode whole data to send will be packed into one indirect buffer.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks, Arseniy
> >>>
> >>> Actually the reverse. With indirect you are limited to num_max.
> >>> Without you are limited to whatever space is left in the
> >>> queue (which you did not check here, so you should).
> >>
> >> I mean that with indirect, we only need one buffer, and we can just wait
> >> for enough space - for this single buffer ( as we discussed a little bit before).
> >> But if indirect buffer is not supported - we need that whole packet must fit
> >> to the size of tx queue - otherwise it never be transmitted.
> >>
> >> Thanks, Arseniy
> >
> >
> > yes but according to virtio spec it's illegal to add s/g that is bigger
> > than queue size.
>
> Aah, so even in case of indirect buffers feature, buffer descriptors stored in memory
> pointed by indirect buffer must be accounted against queue size ?
>
> Thanks, Arseniy
a single indirect buffer can't exceed vq size.
> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>> + res = true;
> >>>>> + }
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + rcu_read_unlock();
> >>>
> >>> Just curious:
> >>> is the point of all this RCU dance to allow vsock
> >>> to change from under us? then why is it ok to
> >>> have it change? the virtio_transport_msgzerocopy_check_iov
> >>> will then refer to the old vsock ...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + return res;
> >>>>> +}
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> static bool virtio_transport_seqpacket_allow(u32 remote_cid);
> >>>>>
> >>>>> static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = {
> >>>>> @@ -475,6 +512,8 @@ static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = {
> >>>>> .seqpacket_allow = virtio_transport_seqpacket_allow,
> >>>>> .seqpacket_has_data = virtio_transport_seqpacket_has_data,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> + .msgzerocopy_check_iov = virtio_transport_msgzerocopy_check_iov,
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> .notify_poll_in = virtio_transport_notify_poll_in,
> >>>>> .notify_poll_out = virtio_transport_notify_poll_out,
> >>>>> .notify_recv_init = virtio_transport_notify_recv_init,
> >>>>> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> >>>>> index 26a4d10da205..e4e3d541aff4 100644
> >>>>> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> >>>>> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> >>>>> @@ -37,73 +37,122 @@ virtio_transport_get_ops(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
> >>>>> return container_of(t, struct virtio_transport, transport);
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -/* Returns a new packet on success, otherwise returns NULL.
> >>>>> - *
> >>>>> - * If NULL is returned, errp is set to a negative errno.
> >>>>> - */
> >>>>> -static struct sk_buff *
> >>>>> -virtio_transport_alloc_skb(struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info *info,
> >>>>> - size_t len,
> >>>>> - u32 src_cid,
> >>>>> - u32 src_port,
> >>>>> - u32 dst_cid,
> >>>>> - u32 dst_port)
> >>>>> -{
> >>>>> - const size_t skb_len = VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_HEADROOM + len;
> >>>>> - struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr;
> >>>>> - struct sk_buff *skb;
> >>>>> - void *payload;
> >>>>> - int err;
> >>>>> +static bool virtio_transport_can_zcopy(struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info *info,
> >>>>> + size_t max_to_send)
> >>>>> +{
> >>>>> + const struct vsock_transport *t;
> >>>>> + struct iov_iter *iov_iter;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - skb = virtio_vsock_alloc_skb(skb_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> >>>>> - if (!skb)
> >>>>> - return NULL;
> >>>>> + if (!info->msg)
> >>>>> + return false;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb);
> >>>>> - hdr->type = cpu_to_le16(info->type);
> >>>>> - hdr->op = cpu_to_le16(info->op);
> >>>>> - hdr->src_cid = cpu_to_le64(src_cid);
> >>>>> - hdr->dst_cid = cpu_to_le64(dst_cid);
> >>>>> - hdr->src_port = cpu_to_le32(src_port);
> >>>>> - hdr->dst_port = cpu_to_le32(dst_port);
> >>>>> - hdr->flags = cpu_to_le32(info->flags);
> >>>>> - hdr->len = cpu_to_le32(len);
> >>>>> + iov_iter = &info->msg->msg_iter;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - if (info->msg && len > 0) {
> >>>>> - payload = skb_put(skb, len);
> >>>>> - err = memcpy_from_msg(payload, info->msg, len);
> >>>>> - if (err)
> >>>>> - goto out;
> >>>>> + t = vsock_core_get_transport(info->vsk);
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - if (msg_data_left(info->msg) == 0 &&
> >>>>> - info->type == VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_SEQPACKET) {
> >>>>> - hdr->flags |= cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM);
> >>>>> + if (t->msgzerocopy_check_iov &&
> >>>>> + !t->msgzerocopy_check_iov(iov_iter))
> >>>>> + return false;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - if (info->msg->msg_flags & MSG_EOR)
> >>>>> - hdr->flags |= cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR);
> >>>>> - }
> >>>>> + /* Data is simple buffer. */
> >>>>> + if (iter_is_ubuf(iov_iter))
> >>>>> + return true;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + if (!iter_is_iovec(iov_iter))
> >>>>> + return false;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + if (iov_iter->iov_offset)
> >>>>> + return false;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + /* We can't send whole iov. */
> >>>>> + if (iov_iter->count > max_to_send)
> >>>>> + return false;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + return true;
> >>>>> +}
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +static int virtio_transport_init_zcopy_skb(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> >>>>> + struct sk_buff *skb,
> >>>>> + struct msghdr *msg,
> >>>>> + bool zerocopy)
> >>>>> +{
> >>>>> + struct ubuf_info *uarg;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + if (msg->msg_ubuf) {
> >>>>> + uarg = msg->msg_ubuf;
> >>>>> + net_zcopy_get(uarg);
> >>>>> + } else {
> >>>>> + struct iov_iter *iter = &msg->msg_iter;
> >>>>> + struct ubuf_info_msgzc *uarg_zc;
> >>>>> + int len;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + /* Only ITER_IOVEC or ITER_UBUF are allowed and
> >>>>> + * checked before.
> >>>>> + */
> >>>>> + if (iter_is_iovec(iter))
> >>>>> + len = iov_length(iter->__iov, iter->nr_segs);
> >>>>> + else
> >>>>> + len = iter->count;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + uarg = msg_zerocopy_realloc(sk_vsock(vsk),
> >>>>> + len,
> >>>>> + NULL);
> >>>>> + if (!uarg)
> >>>>> + return -1;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + uarg_zc = uarg_to_msgzc(uarg);
> >>>>> + uarg_zc->zerocopy = zerocopy ? 1 : 0;
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - if (info->reply)
> >>>>> - virtio_vsock_skb_set_reply(skb);
> >>>>> + skb_zcopy_init(skb, uarg);
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - trace_virtio_transport_alloc_pkt(src_cid, src_port,
> >>>>> - dst_cid, dst_port,
> >>>>> - len,
> >>>>> - info->type,
> >>>>> - info->op,
> >>>>> - info->flags);
> >>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>> +}
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - if (info->vsk && !skb_set_owner_sk_safe(skb, sk_vsock(info->vsk))) {
> >>>>> - WARN_ONCE(1, "failed to allocate skb on vsock socket with sk_refcnt == 0\n");
> >>>>> - goto out;
> >>>>> +static int virtio_transport_fill_skb(struct sk_buff *skb,
> >>>>> + struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info *info,
> >>>>> + size_t len,
> >>>>> + bool zcopy)
> >>>>> +{
> >>>>> + if (zcopy) {
> >>>>> + return __zerocopy_sg_from_iter(info->msg, NULL, skb,
> >>>>> + &info->msg->msg_iter,
> >>>>> + len);
> >>>>> + } else {
> >>>>> + void *payload;
> >>>>> + int err;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + payload = skb_put(skb, len);
> >>>>> + err = memcpy_from_msg(payload, info->msg, len);
> >>>>> + if (err)
> >>>>> + return -1;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + if (msg_data_left(info->msg))
> >>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>> }
> >>>>> +}
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - return skb;
> >>>>> +static void virtio_transport_init_hdr(struct sk_buff *skb,
> >>>>> + struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info *info,
> >>>>> + u32 src_cid,
> >>>>> + u32 src_port,
> >>>>> + u32 dst_cid,
> >>>>> + u32 dst_port,
> >>>>> + size_t len)
> >>>>> +{
> >>>>> + struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -out:
> >>>>> - kfree_skb(skb);
> >>>>> - return NULL;
> >>>>> + hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb);
> >>>>> + hdr->type = cpu_to_le16(info->type);
> >>>>> + hdr->op = cpu_to_le16(info->op);
> >>>>> + hdr->src_cid = cpu_to_le64(src_cid);
> >>>>> + hdr->dst_cid = cpu_to_le64(dst_cid);
> >>>>> + hdr->src_port = cpu_to_le32(src_port);
> >>>>> + hdr->dst_port = cpu_to_le32(dst_port);
> >>>>> + hdr->flags = cpu_to_le32(info->flags);
> >>>>> + hdr->len = cpu_to_le32(len);
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> static void virtio_transport_copy_nonlinear_skb(const struct sk_buff *skb,
> >>>>> @@ -214,6 +263,70 @@ static u16 virtio_transport_get_type(struct sock *sk)
> >>>>> return VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_SEQPACKET;
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +static struct sk_buff *virtio_transport_alloc_skb(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> >>>>> + struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info *info,
> >>>>> + size_t payload_len,
> >>>>> + bool zcopy,
> >>>>> + u32 src_cid,
> >>>>> + u32 src_port,
> >>>>> + u32 dst_cid,
> >>>>> + u32 dst_port)
> >>>>> +{
> >>>>> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> >>>>> + size_t skb_len;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + skb_len = VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_HEADROOM;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + if (!zcopy)
> >>>>> + skb_len += payload_len;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + skb = virtio_vsock_alloc_skb(skb_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> >>>>> + if (!skb)
> >>>>> + return NULL;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + virtio_transport_init_hdr(skb, info, src_cid, src_port,
> >>>>> + dst_cid, dst_port,
> >>>>> + payload_len);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + /* Set owner here, because '__zerocopy_sg_from_iter()' uses
> >>>>> + * owner of skb without check to update 'sk_wmem_alloc'.
> >>>>> + */
> >>>>> + if (vsk)
> >>>>> + skb_set_owner_w(skb, sk_vsock(vsk));
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + if (info->msg && payload_len > 0) {
> >>>>> + int err;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + err = virtio_transport_fill_skb(skb, info, payload_len, zcopy);
> >>>>> + if (err)
> >>>>> + goto out;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + if (info->type == VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_SEQPACKET) {
> >>>>> + struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + hdr->flags |= cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + if (info->msg->msg_flags & MSG_EOR)
> >>>>> + hdr->flags |= cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR);
> >>>>> + }
> >>>>> + }
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + if (info->reply)
> >>>>> + virtio_vsock_skb_set_reply(skb);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + trace_virtio_transport_alloc_pkt(src_cid, src_port,
> >>>>> + dst_cid, dst_port,
> >>>>> + payload_len,
> >>>>> + info->type,
> >>>>> + info->op,
> >>>>> + info->flags);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + return skb;
> >>>>> +out:
> >>>>> + kfree_skb(skb);
> >>>>> + return NULL;
> >>>>> +}
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> /* This function can only be used on connecting/connected sockets,
> >>>>> * since a socket assigned to a transport is required.
> >>>>> *
> >>>>> @@ -222,10 +335,12 @@ static u16 virtio_transport_get_type(struct sock *sk)
> >>>>> static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> >>>>> struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info *info)
> >>>>> {
> >>>>> + u32 max_skb_len = VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE;
> >>>>> u32 src_cid, src_port, dst_cid, dst_port;
> >>>>> const struct virtio_transport *t_ops;
> >>>>> struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs;
> >>>>> u32 pkt_len = info->pkt_len;
> >>>>> + bool can_zcopy = false;
> >>>>> u32 rest_len;
> >>>>> int ret;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> @@ -254,15 +369,30 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> >>>>> if (pkt_len == 0 && info->op == VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW)
> >>>>> return pkt_len;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> + if (info->msg) {
> >>>>> + /* If zerocopy is not enabled by 'setsockopt()', we behave as
> >>>>> + * there is no MSG_ZEROCOPY flag set.
> >>>>> + */
> >>>>> + if (!sock_flag(sk_vsock(vsk), SOCK_ZEROCOPY))
> >>>>> + info->msg->msg_flags &= ~MSG_ZEROCOPY;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + if (info->msg->msg_flags & MSG_ZEROCOPY)
> >>>>> + can_zcopy = virtio_transport_can_zcopy(info, pkt_len);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + if (can_zcopy)
> >>>>> + max_skb_len = min_t(u32, VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE,
> >>>>> + (MAX_SKB_FRAGS * PAGE_SIZE));
> >>>>> + }
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> rest_len = pkt_len;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> do {
> >>>>> struct sk_buff *skb;
> >>>>> size_t skb_len;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - skb_len = min_t(u32, VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE, rest_len);
> >>>>> + skb_len = min(max_skb_len, rest_len);
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - skb = virtio_transport_alloc_skb(info, skb_len,
> >>>>> + skb = virtio_transport_alloc_skb(vsk, info, skb_len, can_zcopy,
> >>>>> src_cid, src_port,
> >>>>> dst_cid, dst_port);
> >>>>> if (!skb) {
> >>>>> @@ -270,6 +400,17 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> >>>>> break;
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> + /* This is last skb to send this portion of data. */
> >>>>> + if (info->msg && info->msg->msg_flags & MSG_ZEROCOPY &&
> >>>>> + skb_len == rest_len && info->op == VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW) {
> >>>>> + if (virtio_transport_init_zcopy_skb(vsk, skb,
> >>>>> + info->msg,
> >>>>> + can_zcopy)) {
> >>>>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> >>>>> + break;
> >>>>> + }
> >>>>> + }
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> virtio_transport_inc_tx_pkt(vvs, skb);
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ret = t_ops->send_pkt(skb);
> >>>>> @@ -934,7 +1075,7 @@ static int virtio_transport_reset_no_sock(const struct virtio_transport *t,
> >>>>> if (!t)
> >>>>> return -ENOTCONN;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - reply = virtio_transport_alloc_skb(&info, 0,
> >>>>> + reply = virtio_transport_alloc_skb(NULL, &info, 0, false,
> >>>>> le64_to_cpu(hdr->dst_cid),
> >>>>> le32_to_cpu(hdr->dst_port),
> >>>>> le64_to_cpu(hdr->src_cid),
> >>>
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists