[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ca4ad735-5605-3fd4-c903-fe5b039cf6a8@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 16:08:44 +0200
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
To: Dingyan Li <18500469033@....com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
sebastian.reichel@...labora.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: add usbfs ioctl to get specific superspeedplus rates
On 25.07.23 15:54, Dingyan Li wrote:
> If we can't "deprecate" ioctls, can we change the returned contents of existing ones?
No. Absolutely not. That is totally unacceptable. It would be much
worse than just removing the support.
Regards
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists