linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 3/6] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping kernel-emulated instructions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 25 Jul 2023 16:37:18 +0200
From:   Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jens Freimann <jfreimann@...hat.com>,
        Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/6] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping kernel-emulated instructions

Single-stepping a kernel-emulated instruction that generates an
interrupt causes GDB to land on the instruction following it instead of
the respective interrupt handler.

The reason is that kvm_handle_sie_intercept(), after injecting the
interrupt, also processes the PER event and arranges a KVM_SINGLESTEP
exit. The interrupt is not yet delivered, however, so the userspace
sees the next instruction.

Fix by avoiding the KVM_SINGLESTEP exit when there is a pending
interrupt. The next __vcpu_run() loop iteration will arrange a
KVM_SINGLESTEP exit after delivering the interrupt.

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c b/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
index e54496740859..db222c749e5e 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
@@ -583,6 +583,19 @@ static int handle_pv_notification(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return handle_instruction(vcpu);
 }
 
+static bool should_handle_per_ifetch(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int rc)
+{
+	/* Process PER, also if the instruction is processed in user space. */
+	if (!(vcpu->arch.sie_block->icptstatus & 0x02))
+		return false;
+	if (rc != 0 && rc != -EOPNOTSUPP)
+		return false;
+	if (guestdbg_sstep_enabled(vcpu) && vcpu->arch.local_int.pending_irqs)
+		/* __vcpu_run() will exit after delivering the interrupt. */
+		return false;
+	return true;
+}
+
 int kvm_handle_sie_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	int rc, per_rc = 0;
@@ -645,9 +658,7 @@ int kvm_handle_sie_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 	}
 
-	/* process PER, also if the instruction is processed in user space */
-	if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->icptstatus & 0x02 &&
-	    (!rc || rc == -EOPNOTSUPP))
+	if (should_handle_per_ifetch(vcpu, rc))
 		per_rc = kvm_s390_handle_per_ifetch_icpt(vcpu);
 	return per_rc ? per_rc : rc;
 }
-- 
2.41.0